ArticleAnnals of botany2021
Three founding ancestral genomes involved in the origin of sugarcane.
Article in Annals of botany, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification and functional annotation of drought-induced molecular pathways in sugarcane using suppression subtractive hybridization.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Establishment of an efficientFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- The repeatome landscape in the "Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Article
- An Overview of Spirits Made from Sugarcane Juice.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Polyploidy: its consequences and enabling role in plant diversification and evolution.Annals of botany · 2023Article
- Assessing the genetic integrity of sugarcane germplasm in the USDA-ARS National Plant Germplasm System collection using single-dose SNP markers.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Long read transcriptome sequencing of a sugarcane hybrid and its progenitors,Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Reconstruction of karyotypic evolution in Saccharum spontaneum species by comparative oligo-FISH mapping.BMC plant biology · 2022Article
- Expression Profiling and MicroRNA Regulatory Networks of Homeobox Family Genes in SugarcaneInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Review
- Comparative Analysis of Chloroplast Genome inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Allele expression biases in mixed-ploid sugarcane accessions.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Limited allele-specific gene expression in highly polyploid sugarcane.Genome research · 2022Article
- Hybridization, missing wild ancestors and the domestication of cultivated diploid bananas.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsModern sugarcane cultivars (Saccharum spp.) are high polyploids, aneuploids (2n = ~12x = ~120) derived from interspecific hybridizations between the domesticated sweet species Saccharum officinarum and the wild species S. spontaneum.
methodsTo analyse the architecture and origin of such a complex genome, we analysed the sequences of all 12 hom(oe)ologous haplotypes (BAC clones) from two distinct genomic regions of a typical modern cultivar, as well as the corresponding sequence in Miscanthus sinense and Sorghum bicolor, and monitored their distribution among representatives of the Saccharum genus. KEY
resultsThe diversity observed among haplotypes suggested the existence of three founding genomes (A, B, C) in modern cultivars, which diverged between 0.8 and 1.3 Mya. Two genomes (A, B) were contributed by S. officinarum; these were also found in its wild presumed ancestor S. robustum, and one genome (C) was contributed by S. spontaneum. These results suggest that S. officinarum and S. robustum are derived from interspecific hybridization between two unknown ancestors (A and B genomes). The A genome contributed most haplotypes (nine or ten) while the B and C genomes contributed one or two haplotypes in the regions analysed of this typical modern cultivar. Interspecific hybridizations likely involved accessions or gametes with distinct ploidy levels and/or were followed by a series of backcrosses with the A genome. The three founding genomes were found in all S. barberi, S. sinense and modern cultivars analysed. None of the analysed accessions contained only the A genome or the B genome, suggesting that representatives of these founding genomes remain to be discovered.
conclusionsThis evolutionary model, which combines interspecificity and high polyploidy, can explain the variable chromosome pairing affinity observed in Saccharum. It represents a major revision of the understanding of Saccharum diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.