Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33637991›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2021

Three founding ancestral genomes involved in the origin of sugarcane.

Nicolas Pompidor, Carine Charron, Catherine Hervouet, Stéphanie Bocs, Gaëtan Droc, Ronan Rivallan, Aurore Manez, Therese Mitros, Kankshita Swaminathan, Jean-Christophe Glaszmann and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Establishment of an efficientFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  3. The repeatome landscape in the "Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. An Overview of Spirits Made from Sugarcane Juice.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Comparative Analysis of Chloroplast Genome inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicolas PompidorCIRAD, UMR AGAP, Montpellier, France.
Carine CharronCIRAD, UMR AGAP, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0281-9936
Catherine HervouetCIRAD, UMR AGAP, Montpellier, France.
Stéphanie BocsCIRAD, UMR AGAP, Montpellier, France.
Gaëtan DrocCIRAD, UMR AGAP, Montpellier, France.
Ronan RivallanCIRAD, UMR AGAP, Montpellier, France.
Aurore ManezCIRAD, UMR AGAP, Montpellier, France.
Therese MitrosDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Kankshita SwaminathanDepartment of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.
Jean-Christophe GlaszmannCIRAD, UMR AGAP, Montpellier, France.
Olivier GarsmeurCIRAD, UMR AGAP, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8869-3689
Angélique D'HontCIRAD, UMR AGAP, Montpellier, France.
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsModern sugarcane cultivars (Saccharum spp.) are high polyploids, aneuploids (2n = ~12x = ~120) derived from interspecific hybridizations between the domesticated sweet species Saccharum officinarum and the wild species S. spontaneum.

methodsTo analyse the architecture and origin of such a complex genome, we analysed the sequences of all 12 hom(oe)ologous haplotypes (BAC clones) from two distinct genomic regions of a typical modern cultivar, as well as the corresponding sequence in Miscanthus sinense and Sorghum bicolor, and monitored their distribution among representatives of the Saccharum genus. KEY

resultsThe diversity observed among haplotypes suggested the existence of three founding genomes (A, B, C) in modern cultivars, which diverged between 0.8 and 1.3 Mya. Two genomes (A, B) were contributed by S. officinarum; these were also found in its wild presumed ancestor S. robustum, and one genome (C) was contributed by S. spontaneum. These results suggest that S. officinarum and S. robustum are derived from interspecific hybridization between two unknown ancestors (A and B genomes). The A genome contributed most haplotypes (nine or ten) while the B and C genomes contributed one or two haplotypes in the regions analysed of this typical modern cultivar. Interspecific hybridizations likely involved accessions or gametes with distinct ploidy levels and/or were followed by a series of backcrosses with the A genome. The three founding genomes were found in all S. barberi, S. sinense and modern cultivars analysed. None of the analysed accessions contained only the A genome or the B genome, suggesting that representatives of these founding genomes remain to be discovered.

conclusionsThis evolutionary model, which combines interspecificity and high polyploidy, can explain the variable chromosome pairing affinity observed in Saccharum. It represents a major revision of the understanding of Saccharum diversity.

Indexed as

SaccharumGenome, PlantGenomicsHaplotypesPolyploidydiversityfounding ancestral genomehybridizationpolyploidySaccharumsugarcane

Identifiers

PMID33637991
PMCPMC8103802
OpenAlexW3131755171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.