Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33637984›Full record

ReviewAnnals of work exposures and health2021

Development of a Job-Exposure Matrix for Ultrafine Particle Exposure: The MatPUF JEM.

Sabyne Audignon-Durand, Céline Gramond, Stéphane Ducamp, Guyguy Manangama, Alain Garrigou, Fleur Delva, Patrick Brochard, Aude Lacourt

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of work exposures and health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sabyne Audignon-DurandUniversity of Bordeaux, Inserm UMR 1219 EPICENE Team, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, 146 rue Léo Saignat, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1865-5588
Céline GramondUniversity of Bordeaux, Inserm UMR 1219 EPICENE Team, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, 146 rue Léo Saignat, Bordeaux, France.
Stéphane DucampSanté Publique France, Division of Environmental and Occupational health, 12 rue du Val d'Osne, Saint Maurice, France.
Guyguy ManangamaUniversity of Bordeaux, Inserm UMR 1219 EPICENE Team, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, 146 rue Léo Saignat, Bordeaux, France.
Alain GarrigouUniversity of Bordeaux, Inserm UMR 1219 EPICENE Team, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, 146 rue Léo Saignat, Bordeaux, France.
Fleur DelvaUniversity of Bordeaux, Inserm UMR 1219 EPICENE Team, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, 146 rue Léo Saignat, Bordeaux, France.
Patrick BrochardUniversity of Bordeaux, Inserm UMR 1219 EPICENE Team, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, 146 rue Léo Saignat, Bordeaux, France.
Aude LacourtUniversity of Bordeaux, Inserm UMR 1219 EPICENE Team, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, 146 rue Léo Saignat, Bordeaux, France.
Université de Bordeaux · FRSanté Publique France · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUltrafine particles (UFPs) are generated from common work processes and have thus existed for a long time. Far more prevalent than engineered nanoparticles, they share common toxicological characteristics with them. However, there is no existing retrospective assessment tool specific to UFPs, for example, for epidemiological purposes. Thus, we aimed to develop a job-exposure matrix dedicated to UFPs.

methodFifty-seven work processes were identified as well as the chemical composition of UFPs emitted, following a literature review and the input of an expert panel. These work processes were associated with occupational codes as defined by the ISCO 1968 classification. The probability and frequency of UFP exposure were assessed for each combination of occupational code and process. Summarized probabilities and frequencies were then calculated for all ISCO occupational codes associated with several processes. Variations in exposure over time or across industrial sectors were accounted for in the assessment of each occupational code.

resultsIn the ISCO classification, 52.8% of the occupational codes (n = 835) assessed were associated with exposure to UFPs, consisting mainly of carbonaceous, metallic, and mineral families (39.5%, 22 and, 15.8%, respectively). Among them, 42.6% involved very probable exposure, and at a high frequency (regularly or continuously).

conclusionThese results suggest that occupational exposure to UFPs may be extensive at the workplace and could concern a wide variety of workers. Pending the integration of a third parameter assessing the intensity of UFP exposure, the MatPUF JEM already constitutes a promising and easy-to-use tool to study the possible adverse health effects of UFPs at work. It may also guide prevention policies in the occupational environments concerned, including those involving engineered nanoparticles.

Indexed as

Occupational ExposureParticulate MatterHumansRetrospective StudiesWorkplaceParticulate Matterexposure assessmentjob-exposure matrixnanoscale particlesoccupational exposureultrafine particles

Identifiers

PMID33637984
PMCPMC8274551
OpenAlexW3131724554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.