Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33637874›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2021

A versatile microfluidic platform measures hyphal interactions between Fusarium graminearum and Clonostachys rosea in real-time.

Alejandro Gimeno, Claire E Stanley, Zacharie Ngamenie, Ming-Hui Hsung, Florian Walder, Stefanie S Schmieder, Saskia Bindschedler, Pilar Junier, Beat Keller, Susanne Vogelgsang

Open access · goldAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Lab on a chip · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Containment ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Alejandro Gimeno *Ecological Plant Protection in Arable Crops, Plant Protection, Agroscope, Zurich, Switzerland.
Claire E Stanley *Institute for Chemical and Bioengineering, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland. claire.stanley@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0825-625X
Zacharie NgamenieEcological Plant Protection in Arable Crops, Plant Protection, Agroscope, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ming-Hui HsungPlant-Soil Interactions, Agroecology and Environment Research Division, Agroscope, Zurich, Switzerland.
Florian WalderPlant-Soil Interactions, Agroecology and Environment Research Division, Agroscope, Zurich, Switzerland.
Stefanie S SchmiederInstitute of Microbiology, Department of Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3696-9468
Saskia BindschedlerLaboratory of Microbiology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Pilar JunierLaboratory of Microbiology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8618-3340
Beat KellerMolecular Plant Biology and Phytopathology, Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2379-9225
Susanne VogelgsangEcological Plant Protection in Arable Crops, Plant Protection, Agroscope, Zurich, Switzerland. susanne.vogelgsang@agroscope.admin.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7214-3575
Agroscope · CHUniversity of Neuchâtel · CHUniversity of Zurich · CHBoston Children's Hospital · USETH Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Routinely, fungal-fungal interactions (FFI) are studied on agar surfaces. However, this format restricts high-resolution dynamic imaging. To gain experimental access to FFI at the hyphal level in real-time, we developed a microfluidic platform, a FFI device. This device utilises microchannel geometry to enhance the visibility of hyphal growth and provides control channels to allow comparisons between localised and systemic effects. We demonstrate its function by investigating the FFI between the biological control agent (BCA) Clonostachys rosea and the plant pathogen Fusarium graminearum. Microscope image analyses confirm the inhibitory effect of the necrotrophic BCA and we show that a loss of fluorescence in parasitised hyphae of GFP-tagged F. graminearum coincides with the detection of GFP in mycelium of C. rosea. The versatility of our device to operate under both water-saturated and nutrient-rich as well as dry and nutrient-deficient conditions, coupled with its spatio-temporal output, opens new opportunities to study relationships between fungi.

Indexed as

Lab-On-A-Chip DevicesMicroscopy, FluorescencePest Control, BiologicalFusariumGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHyphaeHypocrealesMicrobial ViabilityMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesTime FactorsGreen Fluorescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID33637874
PMCPMC7910300
OpenAlexW3132217591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.