Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33637860›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2021

Sociality sculpts similar patterns of molecular evolution in two independently evolved lineages of eusocial bees.

Wyatt A Shell, Michael A Steffen, Hannah K Pare, Arun S Seetharam, Andrew J Severin, Amy L Toth, Sandra M Rehan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Genome Evolution in Social Insects.Genome biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  4. The genetic foundations of convergent traits.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Evolution of Bees: Insights from 'Omic Studies.Genome biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Molecular Substrates of Insect Eusociality.Annual review of genetics · 2024
    Review
  14. Pervasive relaxed selection in termite genomes.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Putting hornets on the genomic map.Scientific reports · 2023
    Article
  17. Molecular patterns and processes in evolving sociality: lessons from insects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Signatures of Positive Selection in the Genome ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wyatt A ShellDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8617-9229
Michael A SteffenDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, 03924, USA.
Hannah K PareDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, 03924, USA.
Arun S SeetharamOffice of Biotechnology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6789-9298
Andrew J SeverinOffice of Biotechnology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8015-9665
Amy L TothDepartment of Entomology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0824-0933
Sandra M RehanDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada. sandra.rehan@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While it is well known that the genome can affect social behavior, recent models posit that social lifestyles can, in turn, influence genome evolution. Here, we perform the most phylogenetically comprehensive comparative analysis of 16 bee genomes to date: incorporating two published and four new carpenter bee genomes (Apidae: Xylocopinae) for a first-ever genomic comparison with a monophyletic clade containing solitary through advanced eusocial taxa. We find that eusocial lineages have undergone more gene family expansions, feature more signatures of positive selection, and have higher counts of taxonomically restricted genes than solitary and weakly social lineages. Transcriptomic data reveal that caste-affiliated genes are deeply-conserved; gene regulatory and functional elements are more closely tied to social phenotype than phylogenetic lineage; and regulatory complexity increases steadily with social complexity. Overall, our study provides robust empirical evidence that social evolution can act as a major and surprisingly consistent driver of macroevolutionary genomic change.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalEvolution, MolecularGenes, InsectGenome, InsectSocial BehaviorAnimalsBeesGene-Environment InteractionGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGenomicsPhylogenySpecies SpecificityTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID33637860
PMCPMC7977082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.