Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33637859›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2021

Automatic multilabel detection of ICD10 codes in Dutch cardiology discharge letters using neural networks.

Arjan Sammani, Ayoub Bagheri, Peter G M van der Heijden, Anneline S J M Te Riele, Annette F Baas, C A J Oosters, Daniel Oberski, Folkert W Asselbergs

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Artificial intelligence in cardiology: the debate continues.European heart journal. Digital health · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Arjan Sammani *Department of Cardiology, Division of Heart & Lungs, University Medical Centre Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. A.zabihisammani@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5557-9342
Ayoub Bagheri *Department of Cardiology, Division of Heart & Lungs, University Medical Centre Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Peter G M van der HeijdenDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Anneline S J M Te RieleDepartment of Cardiology, Division of Heart & Lungs, University Medical Centre Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Annette F BaasDepartment of Genetics, Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
C A J OostersDepartment of Information and Finance, Division of Health Administration and Information, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Daniel OberskiDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7467-2297
Folkert W AsselbergsDepartment of Cardiology, Division of Heart & Lungs, University Medical Centre Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1692-8669
Utrecht University · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

Hartstichting (Dutch Heart Foundation) 2015T041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standard reference terminology of diagnoses and risk factors is crucial for billing, epidemiological studies, and inter/intranational comparisons of diseases. The International Classification of Disease (ICD) is a standardized and widely used method, but the manual classification is an enormously time-consuming endeavor. Natural language processing together with machine learning allows automated structuring of diagnoses using ICD-10 codes, but the limited performance of machine learning models, the necessity of gigantic datasets, and poor reliability of terminal parts of these codes restricted clinical usability. We aimed to create a high performing pipeline for automated classification of reliable ICD-10 codes in the free medical text in cardiology. We focussed on frequently used and well-defined three- and four-digit ICD-10 codes that still have enough granularity to be clinically relevant such as atrial fibrillation (I48), acute myocardial infarction (I21), or dilated cardiomyopathy (I42.0). Our pipeline uses a deep neural network known as a Bidirectional Gated Recurrent Unit Neural Network and was trained and tested with 5548 discharge letters and validated in 5089 discharge and procedural letters. As in clinical practice discharge letters may be labeled with more than one code, we assessed the single- and multilabel performance of main diagnoses and cardiovascular risk factors. We investigated using both the entire body of text and only the summary paragraph, supplemented by age and sex. Given the privacy-sensitive information included in discharge letters, we added a de-identification step. The performance was high, with F1 scores of 0.76-0.99 for three-character and 0.87-0.98 for four-character ICD-10 codes, and was best when using complete discharge letters. Adding variables age/sex did not affect results. For model interpretability, word coefficients were provided and qualitative assessment of classification was manually performed. Because of its high performance, this pipeline can be useful to decrease the administrative burden of classifying discharge diagnoses and may serve as a scaffold for reimbursement and research applications.

Identifiers

PMID33637859
PMCPMC7910461
OpenAlexW3131759468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.