Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33637591›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2021

Technologic (R)Evolution Leads to Detection of More Sentinel Nodes in Patients with Melanoma in the Head and Neck Region.

Danique M S Berger, Nynke S van den Berg, Vincent van der Noort, Bernies van der Hiel, Renato A Valdés Olmos, Tessa A Buckle, Gijs H KleinJan, Oscar R Brouwer, Lenka Vermeeren, Baris Karakullukçu and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparison of two hybrid sentinel node tracers: indocyanine green (ICG)-European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Precision Surgery Guided by Intraoperative Molecular Imaging.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Danique M S BergerDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; d.berger@nki.nl m.klop@nki.nl.
Nynke S van den BergDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Vincent van der NoortDepartment of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bernies van der HielDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Renato A Valdés OlmosDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tessa A BuckleInterventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Gijs H KleinJanDepartment of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Oscar R BrouwerDepartment of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lenka VermeerenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Baris KarakullukçuDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michiel W M van den BrekelDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bart A van de WielDepartment of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and.
Omgo E NiewegMelanoma Institute Australia and Central Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Alfons J M BalmDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Fijs W B van LeeuwenInterventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
W Martin C KlopDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLMelanoma Institute Australia · AUOLVG · NLStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy (SNB) has proven to be a valuable tool for staging melanoma patients. Since its introduction in the early 1990s, this procedure has undergone several technologic refinements, including the introduction of SPECT/CT, as well as radioguidance and fluorescence guidance. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the effect of this technologic evolution on SNB in the head and neck region. The primary endpoint was the false-negative (FN) rate. Secondary endpoints were number of harvested SNs, overall operation time, operation time per harvested SN, and postoperative complications.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsMelanomaSentinel Lymph NodeSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSingle Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed Tomographyfalse-negativehead and neckmelanomasentinel lymph node biopsy

Identifiers

PMID33637591
PMCPMC8724899
OpenAlexW3132113297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.