Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33637294›Full record

SynthesisPhysiotherapy2021

Rehabilitation to enable recovery from COVID-19: a rapid systematic review.

Victoria A Goodwin, Louise Allan, Alison Bethel, Alison Cowley, Jane L Cross, Jo Day, Avril Drummond, Abi J Hall, Martin Howard, Naomi Morley and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Physiotherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05012826 (Osteopathy and Physiotherapy Compared to Physiotherapy Alone on Fatigue and Functional Status in Long COVID), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05012826 naunknown statusnot on this map

Osteopathy and Physiotherapy Compared to Physiotherapy Alone on Fatigue and Functional Status in Long COVID: Study Protocol for a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled SuperiorityTrial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentro Universitário Augusto MottaRan2021 to 2023Enrolled104ConditionsCovid19, SARS-CoV-2 InfectionArmsOsteopathic Manipulative Treatment in addition to Physiotherapy, Physiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Surviving COVID-19: patients' experiences of care and path to recovery.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2024
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Rehabilitation of Post-COVID-19 Musculoskeletal Sequelae in Geriatric Patients: A Case Series Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Victoria A GoodwinUniversity of Exeter, UK. Electronic address: v.goodwin@exeter.ac.uk.
Louise AllanUniversity of Exeter, UK.
Alison BethelUniversity of Exeter, UK.
Alison CowleyNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.
Jane L CrossUniversity of East Anglia, UK.
Jo DayUniversity of Exeter, UK.
Avril DrummondUniversity of Nottingham, UK.
Abi J HallUniversity of Exeter, UK.
Martin HowardUniversity of Exeter, UK.
Naomi MorleyUniversity of Exeter, UK.
Jo Thompson CoonUniversity of Exeter, UK.
Sarah E LambUniversity of Exeter, UK.
University of Exeter · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo establish the evidence for rehabilitation interventions tested in populations of patients admitted to ICU and critical care with severe respiratory illness, and consider whether the evidence is generalizable to patients with COVID-19.

methodsThe authors undertook a rapid systematic review. Medline (via OvidSP), CINAHL Complete (via EBSCOhost), Cochrane Library, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and CENTRAL (via Wiley), Epistemonikos (via Epistemonikos.org), PEDro (via pedro.org.au) and OTseeker (via otseeker.com) searched to 7 May 2020. The authors included systematic reviews, RCTs and qualitative studies involving adults with respiratory illness requiring intensive care who received rehabilitation to enhance or restore resulting physical impairments or function. Data were extracted by one author and checked by a second. TIDier was used to guide intervention descriptions. Study quality was assessed using Critical Skills Appraisal Programme (CASP) tools.

resultsSix thousand nine hundred and three titles and abstracts were screened; 24 systematic reviews, 11 RCTs and eight qualitative studies were included. Progressive exercise programmes, early mobilisation and multicomponent interventions delivered in ICU can improve functional independence. Nutritional supplementation in addition to rehabilitation in post-ICU hospital settings may improve performance of activities of daily living. The evidence for rehabilitation after discharge from hospital following an ICU admission is inconclusive. Those receiving rehabilitation valued it, engendering hope and confidence.

conclusionsExercise, early mobilisation and multicomponent programmes may improve recovery following ICU admission for severe respiratory illness that could be generalizable to those with COVID-19. Rehabilitation interventions can bring hope and confidence to individuals but there is a need for an individualised approach and the use of behaviour change strategies. Further research is needed in post-ICU settings and with those who have COVID-19. Registration: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/prc2y.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingCOVID-19Early AmbulationElectric Stimulation TherapyExercise TherapyHumansIntensive Care UnitsMobility LimitationPatient DischargeSARS-CoV-2COVID-19RehabilitationSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33637294
PMCPMC7902208
OpenAlexW3125653108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.