Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33637114›Full record

ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2021

Safety and family satisfaction of a home-delivered chemotherapy program for children with cancer.

Lucia De Zen, Irene Del Rizzo, Luca Ronfani, Francesca Barbieri, Marco Rabusin, Roberto Dall'Amico, Egidio Barbi, Margherita Robazza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Hospital at home for oncologic patients: SEOM-SEHAD consensus on clinical practice.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lucia De ZenPediatric Palliative Care and Pain Service, Institute for Maternal and Child Health Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.
Irene Del RizzoClinical Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy. idr8991@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2370-0021
Luca RonfaniDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Institute for Maternal and Child Health Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.
Francesca BarbieriPediatric Department, Azienda Sanitaria Friuli Occidentale, Pordenone, Italy.
Marco RabusinPediatric Department, Oncology and Hematology Unit, Institute for Maternal and Child Health Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.
Roberto Dall'AmicoPediatric Department, Azienda Sanitaria Friuli Occidentale, Pordenone, Italy.
Egidio BarbiClinical Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Margherita RobazzaPediatric Department, Azienda Sanitaria Friuli Occidentale, Pordenone, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHome chemotherapy programs for children with cancer are safe and feasible, and their impact on the quality of life has been reported in different countries. A home chemotherapy program was implemented between 2011 and 2019 in an Italian region. This pilot study investigates its safety and feasibility, along with parental satisfaction.

methodsPatients between 0 and 18 years diagnosed with malignancy were included. Deceased patients and patients whose families moved abroad or interrupted contact with the service were excluded. Adverse events comprised immediate deterioration of the patient's condition, equipment failure, errors in drug storage, dose or patient identification and personnel safety issues. Parental satisfaction was explored through an email survey of 32 Likert-type and short open questions.

resultsThirty-five patients received 419 doses of intravenous chemotherapy at home (cytarabine, vincristine, vinblastine). No adverse events were reported. Twenty-three families out of 25 eligible completed the survey. Most reported being "very satisfied" with the possibility of maintaining a work/domestic routine and reducing time and financial burden of hospital access. Most were "very satisfied" with the opportunity for their child of being less troubled by the treatment. Besides, most reported being "very satisfied" with the chance for healthy siblings of maintaining their routine and coping with their brother/sister's disease. Most perceived the program as safe. All families recommended extending the program to all children in the region.

conclusionsThis first Italian study supports home chemotherapy as safe and effective, positively influencing the quality of life for children and their families.

Indexed as

Home Care Services, Hospital-BasedPatient SafetyPatient SatisfactionAdolescentAntineoplastic AgentsCatheterization, Central VenousChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantItalyMaleNeoplasmsParentsPilot ProjectsAntineoplastic AgentsChemotherapyChildhood cancerHome assistanceQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID33637114
PMCPMC7908006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.