Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33637113›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2021

Recombinant human endostatin combined with chemotherapy for advanced squamous cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Li Feng, Zhicong Wang, Li Jing, Zhiguo Zhou, Shuai Shi, Ruoying Deng, Yibing Liu, Qingju Meng

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Li Feng *Department of Medical Oncology, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 12 JianKang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei Province, China.
Zhicong Wang *Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.
Li JingDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 12 JianKang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei Province, China.
Zhiguo ZhouDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 12 JianKang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei Province, China.
Shuai ShiHebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.
Ruoying DengHebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.
Yibing LiuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 12 JianKang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei Province, China. lyb.he@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4679-0119
Qingju MengDepartment of Oncology, the First Hospital of Xingtai, Xingtai, Hebei Province, China. qingjumeng@163.com.
Hebei Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper aims to compare the efficacy and safety of recombinant human endostatin combined with chemotherapy in patients with squamous cell lung cancer (SqCLC).

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang database, Metstr, VIP, and others and manually searched books and magazines until 2019 for articles about the efficacy and safety of recombinant human endostatin combined with chemotherapy in patients with SqCLC. A second search was conducted on the review literature. According to the criteria of the literature screen, the relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized controlled trials (non-RCTs) of recombinant human endostatin combined with chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone in the treatment of SqCLC were included. After the data were extracted and analyzed, RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis for the outcome indicators. Then, heterogeneity tests and sensitivity analyses were carried out, and the publication bias of this study was tested in Stata 13.0 software. Six RCTs and eight non-RCTs were included. In total, 821 patients with SqCLC were included.

resultsThe response rate (RR) was 2.12 (95% CI: 1.57-2.85, p < 0.00001). The disease control rate (DCR) was 2.38 (95% CI: 1.70-3.32, p < 0.00001). The difference between the two groups was statistically significant. Regarding safety, the incidence rates of the adverse reactions cardiotoxicity, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and gastrointestinal reactions were not significantly different between the two groups (OR = 1.70, 95% CI: 0.79-3.68; OR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.61-1.42; OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.71-1.64; OR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.56-1.30, respectively).

conclusionThe combined treatment had a better therapeutic effect than chemotherapy alone. It did not increase the incidence of adverse reactions in the course of treatment.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsEndostatinsEpithelial CellsHumansPrognosisEndostatinsDisease control rateEndostarEndostar combined chemotherapyMeta-analysisRecombinant human endostatinResponse rateSquamous cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID33637113
PMCPMC7912552
OpenAlexW3130810772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.