Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33637078›Full record

Observational studyBMC musculoskeletal disorders2021

Fragility fracture identifies patients at imminent risk for subsequent fracture: real-world retrospective database study in Ontario, Canada.

Jonathan D Adachi, Jacques P Brown, Emil Schemitsch, Jean-Eric Tarride, Vivien Brown, Alan D Bell, Maureen Reiner, Millicent Packalen, Ponda Motsepe-Ditshego, Natasha Burke and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Recommendations on screening for primary prevention of fragility fractures.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Impact of a national reimbursement add-on policy on refracture risk and secondary fracture prevention after hip fracture in Japan: a population-based interrupted time series analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Letter to the editor.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The role of physical performance measures in the physiotherapy assessment and management of older adults with osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a narrative review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bone Health, Fragility Fractures, and the Hand Surgeon.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2025
    Review
  11. First fracture in rheumatoid arthritis: analysis by fracture site, gender, age, and comorbidities.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Fracture liaison service-a multidisciplinary approach to osteoporosis management.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Family/caregiver influence on osteoporosis management for older people: an integrative review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jonathan D AdachiDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Jacques P BrownCHU de Québec Research Centre and Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada.
Emil SchemitschDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Jean-Eric TarrideDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Vivien BrownDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Alan D BellDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Maureen ReinerAmgen Inc, California, USA.
Millicent PackalenAmgen Canada Inc., Mississauga, ON, Canada.
Ponda Motsepe-DitshegoAmgen Canada Inc., Mississauga, ON, Canada.
Natasha BurkeAmgen Canada Inc., Mississauga, ON, Canada.
Lubomira SlatkovskaAmgen Canada Inc., Mississauga, ON, Canada. lslatkov@amgen.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5027-7989

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe secondary fracture prevention gap in the osteoporosis field has been previously described as a 'crisis'. Closing this gap is increasingly important in the context of accumulating evidence showing that an incident fragility fracture is associated with an increased risk of subsequent fracture within 1-2 years, known as imminent fracture risk. The objective of this study was to use health services data to characterize the time between index fragility fractures occurring at different osteoporotic sites and subsequent fractures.

methodsThis retrospective observational study used de-identified health services data from the publicly funded healthcare system in Ontario, the largest province of Canada. Patients aged > 65 with an index fragility fracture occurring between 2011 and 2015 were identified from the ICES Data Repository using International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes. We examined median time to subsequent fragility fractures for osteoporotic fracture sites until the end of follow-up (2017). BMD assessment and use of osteoporosis therapies following index fracture were also characterized.

resultsAmong 115,776 patients with an index fragility fracture, 17.8% incurred a second fragility fracture. Median time between index and second fracture occurring at any site was 555 days (interquartile range: 236-955). For each index fracture site examined, median time from index to second fracture was < 2 years. The proportion of patients with BMD assessment was 10.3% ≤1 year prior to and 16.4% ≤1 year post index fracture. The proportion of patients receiving osteoporosis therapy was 29.8% ≤1 year prior, 34.6% ≤1 year post, and 25.9% > 3 years post index fracture.

conclusionsThis cohort of Canadian patients aged > 65 years who experienced a fragility fracture at any site are at imminent risk of experiencing subsequent fracture within the next 2 years and should be proactively assessed and treated.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesAgedHumansOntarioRetrospective StudiesSecondary PreventionBone Density Conservation AgentsFragility fractureImminent fracture riskOsteoporosisPost fracture careReal-world dataSecondary fracture preventionSubsequent fracture

Identifiers

PMID33637078
PMCPMC7908684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.