ArticleBMC women's health2021
Awareness of obstetric danger signs among pregnant women in the Democratic Republic of Congo: evidence from a nationwide cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC women's health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pregnant woman awareness of obstetric danger signs in developing country: systematic review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Pooled it
- Knowledge of pregnancy danger signs and associated factors among pregnant teenagers in Western Hararghe, Ethiopia: a facility-based cross-sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Article
- Protocol to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards obstetric danger signs among pregnant women in a selected hospital in South Africa.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Individual and community level determinants of unmeet pregnancy complication education among pregnant ANC visitor women in Sub-Saharan Africa: a multilevel analysis of the recent demographic and health survey.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Determinants of knowledge of obstetric danger signs among women attending antenatal care in Eastern province, Zambia: a cross-sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Article
- Exploring the prevalence and association between nutritional status and asymptomatic malaria in Rwanda among under-5 children: a cross-sectional analysis.Malaria journal · 2025Article
- The effectiveness of community engagement using M-Mama champions in improving awareness of obstetric danger signs, birth preparedness and complication readiness among pregnant women in Bahi, Dodoma: A cluster randomized pragmatic implementation trial.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Gambian Mothers Lack Obstetric Danger Sign Knowledge, But Educational Intervention Shows Promise.Annals of global health · 2024Article
- Knowledge of Obstetric Danger Signs among Pregnant Women in the Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Article
- Knowledge of obstetric danger signs and associated factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care services at Thai community hospital.F1000Research · 2023Article
- Article
- Functionality of self-care for pregnancy mobile applications: A review study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2022Review
- Maternal knowledge-seeking behavior among pregnant women in Tanzania.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPoor awareness of obstetric danger signs is a major contributing factor to delays in seeking obstetric care and hence to high maternal mortality and morbidity worldwide. We conducted the current study to assess the level of agreement on receipt of counseling on obstetric danger signs between direct observations of antenatal care (ANC) consultation and women's recall in the exit interview. We also identified factors associated with pregnant women's awareness of obstetric danger signs during pregnancy in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)
methodsWe used data from the 2017-2018 DRC Service Provision Assessment survey. Agreement between the observation and woman's recall was measured using Cohen's kappa statistic and percent agreement. Multivariable Zero-Inflated Poisson (ZIP) regression was used to identify factors associated with the number of danger signs during pregnancy the woman knew.
resultsOn average, women were aware of 1.5 ± 1.34 danger signs in pregnancy (range: 0 to 8). Agreement between observation and woman's recall was 70.7%, with a positive agreement of 16.9% at the country level but ranging from 2.1% in Bandundu to 39.7% in Sud Kivu. Using multivariable ZIP analysis, the number of obstetric danger signs the women mentioned was significantly higher in multigravida women (Adj.IRR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.23-1.55), in women attending a private facility (Adj.IRR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.01-1.31), in women attending a subsequent ANC visit (Adj.IRR = 1.11; 95% CI: 1.01-1.21), and in women counseled on danger signs during the ANC visit (Adj.IRR = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.05-1.35). There was a regional variation in the awareness of danger signs, with the least mentioned signs in the middle and the most in the eastern provinces.
conclusionsOur findings indicated poor agreement between directly observed counseling and women's reports that counseling on obstetric danger signs occurred during the current ANC visit. We found that province of residence, provision of counseling on obstetric danger signs, facility ownership, gravidity and the number of ANC visits were predictors of the awareness of obstetric danger signs among pregnant women. These factors should be considered when developing strategies aim at improving women's awareness about obstetric danger signs in the DRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.