Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33636681›Full record

ArticleVision research2021

Color perception and compensation in color deficiencies assessed with hue scaling.

Kara J Emery, Mohana Kuppuswamy Parthasarathy, Daniel S Joyce, Michael A Webster

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Heliyon · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Gaining the system: limits to compensating color deficiencies through post-receptoral gain changes.Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kara J EmeryGraduate Program in Integrative Neuroscience and Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV 89557, United States.
Mohana Kuppuswamy ParthasarathyGraduate Program in Integrative Neuroscience and Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV 89557, United States.
Daniel S JoyceGraduate Program in Integrative Neuroscience and Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV 89557, United States.
Michael A WebsterGraduate Program in Integrative Neuroscience and Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV 89557, United States. Electronic address: mwebster@unr.edu.
University of Nevada, Reno · US

Funding

SALIENCE, ADAPTATION, AND NATURAL IMAGE STATISTICSR01EY010834 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI WEBSTER, MICHAEL A · 2000 to 2023
$4.6M
COLOR CONTRAST ADAPTATIONR29EY010834 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI WEBSTER, MICHAEL A · 1995 to 1999
–
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY010834NEI NIH HHS R29 EY010834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anomalous trichromats have three classes of cone receptors but with smaller separation in the spectral sensitivities of their longer-wave (L or M) cones compared to normal trichromats. As a result, the differences in the responses of the longer-wave cones are smaller, resulting in a weaker input to opponent mechanisms that compare the LvsM responses. Despite this, previous studies have found that their color percepts are more similar to normal trichromats than the smaller LvsM differences predict, suggesting that post-receptoral processes might amplify their responses to compensate for the weaker opponent inputs. We evaluated the degree and form of compensation using a hue-scaling task, in which the appearance of different hues is described by the perceived proportions of red-green or blue-yellow primary colors. The scaling functions were modeled to estimate the relative salience of the red-green to blue-yellow components. The red-green amplitudes of the 10 anomalous observers were 1.5 times weaker than for a group of 26 normal controls. However, their relative sensitivity at threshold for detecting LvsM chromatic contrast was on average 6 times higher, consistent with a 4-fold gain in the suprathreshold hue-scaling responses. Within-observer variability in the settings was similar for the two groups, suggesting that the suprathreshold gain did not similarly amplify the noise, at least for the dimension of hue. While the compensation was pronounced it was nevertheless partial, and anomalous observers differed systematically from the controls in the shapes of the hue-scaling functions and the corresponding loci of their color categories. Factor analyses further revealed different patterns of individual differences between the groups. We discuss the implications of these results for understanding both the processes of compensation for a color deficiency and the limits of these processes.

Indexed as

Color PerceptionRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsColorFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansIndividualityPhotic StimulationAdaptationColor deficiencyColor visionCompensationHue scaling

Identifiers

PMID33636681
PMCPMC8058247
OpenAlexW3133409010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.