Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33636419›Full record

ArticleNutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.)2021

How gender norms affect anemia in select villages in rural Odisha, India: A qualitative study.

Erica Sedlander, Sameera Talegawkar, Rohini Ganjoo, Chandni Ladwa, Loretta DiPietro, Aika Aluc, Rajiv N Rimal

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Sex- and gender-based medicine in pediatric nutrition.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erica SedlanderMilken Institute School of Public Health, Department of Prevention and Community Health, The George Washington University, Washington DC, USA. Electronic address: esedlander@gwmail.gwu.edu.
Sameera TalegawkarMilken Institute School of Public Health, Department of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington DC, USA.
Rohini GanjooSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Biomedical Laboratory Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington DC, USA.
Chandni LadwaMilken Institute School of Public Health, Department of Prevention and Community Health, The George Washington University, Washington DC, USA.
Loretta DiPietroMilken Institute School of Public Health, Department of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington DC, USA.
Aika AlucMilken Institute School of Public Health, Department of Prevention and Community Health, The George Washington University, Washington DC, USA.
Rajiv N RimalMilken Institute School of Public Health, Department of Prevention and Community Health, The George Washington University, Washington DC, USA; Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Milken Institute · USGeorge Washington University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn India, 50% of women of reproductive age, compared with 23% of men, have iron deficiency anemia. Extant research focuses on biological, not social, determinants of this disparity.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to examine how gender norms may affect anemia prevalence among women in rural India.

methodsWe conducted 16 focus group discussions (N = 124) with women of reproductive age, husbands, and mothers-in-law and 25 key informant interviews in four villages in Odisha, India.

resultsWe identified the following themes that help explain how inequitable gender norms exacerbate anemia among women from different castes and tribes: Due to a double burden of work outside the home and completing the majority of unpaid work in the home, women lack time to visit health centers to get tested for anemia and to obtain iron supplements. Women are expected to prioritize the health of their family over their own, thus affecting their access to health care. Women's autonomy to leave the house to seek health care is limited. Men are the primary breadwinners for the family, but often spend their money on alcohol, rather than on iron-rich food for the household. Intra-household food allocation favors men, in-laws, and children, thus women serve their family first, often being left with little food.

conclusionAnemia reduction interventions need to include examination of the whole social context to successfully increase iron supplement use and iron-rich food intake. Understanding how gender norms contribute to anemia could change the narrative from a biomedical to a social justice issue.

Indexed as

AnemiaAnemia, Iron-DeficiencyChildFemaleHumansIndiaIronMaleRural PopulationIronAnemiaGender normsIndiaQualitative

Identifiers

PMID33636419
PMCPMC8209141
OpenAlexW3122350319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.