Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33635935›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Network study of responses to unusualness and psychological stress during the COVID-19 outbreak in Korea.

Seunghyong Ryu, In-Hoo Park, Mina Kim, Yu-Ri Lee, Jonghun Lee, Honey Kim, Min Jhon, Ju-Wan Kim, Ju-Yeon Lee, Jae-Min Kim and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Decline in Hospital Visits by Patients with Schizophrenia Early in the COVID-19 Outbreak in Korea.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Seunghyong RyuDepartment of Psychiatry, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6127-760X
In-Hoo ParkGwangju Mental Health and Welfare Commission, Gwangju, Korea.
Mina KimGwangju Mental Health and Welfare Commission, Gwangju, Korea.
Yu-Ri LeeGwangju Mental Health and Welfare Commission, Gwangju, Korea.
Jonghun LeeDaegu Metropolitan Mental Health and Welfare Center, Daegu, Korea.
Honey KimDepartment of Psychiatry, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Min JhonDepartment of Psychiatry, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Ju-Wan KimDepartment of Psychiatry, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Ju-Yeon LeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Jae-Min KimDepartment of Psychiatry, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Sung-Wan KimDepartment of Psychiatry, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Chonnam National University · KRGwangmyeong Mental Health Welfare Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dramatic changes in people's daily lives caused by the 2019 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic have had a huge impact on their emotions and behaviors. This study aimed to examine psychosocial responses to COVID-19 using network analysis. A total of 1,500 urban residents of South Korea, selected from an online public panel, were surveyed using self-rating questionnaires addressing daily life changes, fear of infection, and distress related to COVID-19. Participants also completed a 10-item Perceived Stress Scale survey. We constructed regularized partial correlation networks, estimated global and local network metrics, tested network accuracy and stability, and compared the estimated networks between men and women. The network of the psychosocial responses consisted of 24 nodes that were classified into five groups: 'fear of infection', 'difficulty with outside activities', 'economic loss', 'altered eating and sleeping', and 'adaptive stress'. The node centralities indicated that 'distress in obtaining daily necessities' and 'concern about harming others' were the most important issues in people's responses to COVID-19. These nodes were connected by a negative edge, reflecting individual- and community-level issues, respectively. The overall level of perceived stress was linked to the network by the connection node 'anger toward others or society', which was associated with economic problems in men, but with distress from changes in daily activities in women. The results suggest that two contrasting feelings-personal insecurity regarding basic needs and a collectivistic orientation-play roles in the response to unusual experiences and distress due to COVID-19. This study also showed that public anger could arise from the psychological stress under the conditions imposed by COVID-19.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdultAngerCOVID-19Disease OutbreaksEmotionsFearFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychological DistressRepublic of KoreaSARS-CoV-2Stress, PsychologicalYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33635935
PMCPMC7909677
OpenAlexW3130608611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.