Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33635855›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2021

Sustained neural rhythms reveal endogenous oscillations supporting speech perception.

Sander van Bree, Ediz Sohoglu, Matthew H Davis, Benedikt Zoefel

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05446350 (Modulating Speech Perception With Current Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05446350 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Modulating Speech Perception With Current Stimulation (SPEECHSTIM)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, ToulouseRan2022 to 2025Enrolled126ConditionsHealthyArmstranscranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), electroencephalography (EEG), brain imaging (fMRI), electroencephalography (EEG) with neurofeedback
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cutaneous Alternating Current Stimulation Can Cause a Phasic Modulation of Speech Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Inattentional Rhythm in Audition.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Challenges and Approaches in the Study of Neural Entrainment.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Entrainment echoes in the cerebellum.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Speech Prosody Serves Temporal Prediction of Language via Contextual Entrainment.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sander van BreeMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4894-5938
Ediz SohogluMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0755-6445
Matthew H DavisMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2239-0778
Benedikt ZoefelMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9800-2551
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GBCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/5Medical Research Council SUAG/044 G101400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhythmic sensory or electrical stimulation will produce rhythmic brain responses. These rhythmic responses are often interpreted as endogenous neural oscillations aligned (or "entrained") to the stimulus rhythm. However, stimulus-aligned brain responses can also be explained as a sequence of evoked responses, which only appear regular due to the rhythmicity of the stimulus, without necessarily involving underlying neural oscillations. To distinguish evoked responses from true oscillatory activity, we tested whether rhythmic stimulation produces oscillatory responses which continue after the end of the stimulus. Such sustained effects provide evidence for true involvement of neural oscillations. In Experiment 1, we found that rhythmic intelligible, but not unintelligible speech produces oscillatory responses in magnetoencephalography (MEG) which outlast the stimulus at parietal sensors. In Experiment 2, we found that transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) leads to rhythmic fluctuations in speech perception outcomes after the end of electrical stimulation. We further report that the phase relation between electroencephalography (EEG) responses and rhythmic intelligible speech can predict the tACS phase that leads to most accurate speech perception. Together, we provide fundamental results for several lines of research-including neural entrainment and tACS-and reveal endogenous neural oscillations as a key underlying principle for speech perception.

Indexed as

AdultBiological ClocksBrainElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMagnetoencephalographyMaleMiddle AgedSpeech PerceptionTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID33635855
PMCPMC7946281
OpenAlexW3132153836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.