ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2021
Evaluating Performance of EEG Data-Driven Machine Learning for Traumatic Brain Injury Classification.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlating Magnetoencephalography, Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging, Biomechanics, and Neuropsychology in American Youth Football.Journal of neurotrauma · 2025Article
- Neural correlates of β-lactam exposure in intensive care unit patients: an observational, prospective cohort study.Journal of neurology · 2025Observational
- A Comparative Neuroimaging Review of Repetitive Head Impacts and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury from Pediatrics to Professionals.Neurotrauma reports · 2025Review
- Using artificial intelligence to optimize anti-seizure treatment and EEG-guided decisions in severe brain injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Review
- A Machine Learning Approach to Classifying EEG Data Collected with or without Haptic Feedback during a Simulated Drilling Task.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Recognition of regions of stroke injury using multi-modal frequency features of electroencephalogram.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- EEG classification of traumatic brain injury and stroke from a nonspecific population using neural networks.PLOS digital health · 2023Article
- Henry gas solubility optimization double machine learning classifier for neurosurgical patients.PloS one · 2023Article
- An extended clinical EEG dataset with 15,300 automatically labelled recordings for pathology decoding.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2023Article
- Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Detection: Past, Present, and Future.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Identification of chronic mild traumatic brain injury using resting state functional MRI and machine learning techniques.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesBig data analytics can potentially benefit the assessment and management of complex neurological conditions by extracting information that is difficult to identify manually. In this study, we evaluated the performance of commonly used supervised machine learning algorithms in the classification of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) history from those with stroke history and/or normal EEG.
methodsSupport vector machine (SVM) and K-nearest neighbors (KNN) models were generated with a diverse feature set from Temple EEG Corpus for both two-class classification of patients with TBI history from normal subjects and three-class classification of TBI, stroke and normal subjects.
resultsFor two-class classification, an accuracy of 0.94 was achieved in 10-fold cross validation (CV), and 0.76 in independent validation (IV). For three-class classification, 0.85 and 0.71 accuracy were reached in CV and IV respectively. Overall, linear discriminant analysis (LDA) feature selection and SVM models consistently performed well in both CV and IV and for both two-class and three-class classification. Compared to normal control, both TBI and stroke patients showed an overall reduction in coherence and relative PSD in delta frequency, and an increase in higher frequency (alpha, mu, beta and gamma) power. But stroke patients showed a greater degree of change and had additional global decrease in theta power.
conclusionsOur study suggests that EEG data-driven machine learning can be a useful tool for TBI classification. SIGNIFICANCE: Our study provides preliminary evidence that EEG ML algorithm can potentially provide specificity to separate different neurological conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.