Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33635778›Full record

ArticleThe Permanente journal2020

Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models: Electronic Health Record Data To Predict Visual Acuity After Cataract Surgery.

Stacey E Alexeeff, Stephen Uong, Liyan Liu, Neal H Shorstein, James Carolan, Laura B Amsden, Lisa J Herrinton

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Permanente journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stacey E AlexeeffDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA.
Stephen UongDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA.
Liyan LiuDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA.
Neal H ShorsteinDepartments of Ophthalmology and Quality, Kaiser Permanente, Walnut Creek, CA.
James CarolanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kaiser Permanente, San Rafael, CA.
Laura B AmsdenDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA.
Lisa J HerrintonDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA.
Kaiser Permanente · USKaiser Permanente San Rafael Medical Center · USKaiser Permanente Walnut Creek Medical Center · US

Funding

Predicting final visual acuity following cataract surgeryR01EY027329 · NEI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HERRINTON, LISA J · 2017 to 2018
$743k
Comparative Effectiveness of Prophylaxis in Cataract SurgeryR21EY022989 · NEI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HERRINTON, LISA J · 2013 to 2014
$432k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027329NEI NIH HHS R21 EY022989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo develop predictive models of final corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) following cataract surgery using machine learning algorithms and electronic health record data.

methodsIn this predictive modeling study we used decision tree, random forest, and gradient boosting. We included the first surgical eye of 64,768 members of Kaiser Permanente Northern California who underwent cataract surgery from June 1, 2010 through May 31, 2015. We measured discrimination and calibration of machine learning models for predicting postoperative CDVA 20/50 or worse vs 20/40 or better.

resultsThe training set included 51,712 patients, and the validation set included 13,056 patients. We compared 3 machine learning models and found that the gradient boosting model provided the best discrimination ability for CDVA. The most important variables for predicting final CDVA 20/50 or worse were preoperative CDVA, age, and age-related macular degeneration, which together accounted for 41% of the gain in optimization of the gradient boosting model. Other important variables in the model included dispensed glaucoma medication, epiretinal membrane, cornea disorder, cataract surgery operating time, surgeon experience, and census block neighborhood characteristics (household income, family income, family poverty, college education, and home residence by owner).

conclusionFor predicting CDVA after cataract surgery, gradient boosting had the best ability to discriminate patients with postoperative CDVA 20/50 or worse from patients with postoperative CDVA 20/40 or better. Machine learning has the potential to improve prognosis and can improve patient information when making decisions to undergo cataract surgery.

Indexed as

CataractCataract ExtractionElectronic Health RecordsHumansMachine LearningVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID33635778
PMCPMC8817938
OpenAlexW3115898000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.