ArticleThe Permanente journal2020
The Quality of Care of Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Patients: The Provider Perspective.
Article in The Permanente journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utilizing community engagement to define research and clinical priorities for gender-affirming hormone therapy.International journal of transgender health · 2025Article
- 'A void in our community': exploring the complexities of delivering and implementing primary care services for transgender individuals in Northern Ontario.Primary health care research & development · 2024Article
- A Mixed Methods Study Describing the Quality of Healthcare Received by Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Patients at a Large Integrated Health System.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTransgender and gender-nonconforming (TGNC) patients have inadequate quality of care. Few studies have examined the issues related to quality of care from the perspective of providers. The purpose of this pilot study was to understand the barriers and facilitators of quality TGNC care and develop recommendations for health systems.
methodsWe used phenomenological methods in the form of qualitative semistructured interviews to allow provider participants to elaborate about issues not covered in the script questions. Audio files from 11 provider interviews were transcribed and summarized by common themes. Thematic analysis was conducted in an iterative process to extract insights from the data.
resultsSix main subthemes resulted from our qualitative review regarding "barriers to quality care": 1) provider training and knowledge of TGNC care, 2) provider and staff interactions with TGNC patients, 3) case management, 4) misgendering, 5) access and continuity of care, and 6) bias and discrimination. Four subthemes were identified as "facilitators of quality care" for TGNC patients: 1) skilled staff, 2) continuity of care and electronic health records, 3) organizational support, and 4) provider-patient interactions. Additional needs were also suggested.
conclusionsFindings were distilled into 3 recommendations to improve the quality of TGNC care: 1) establish a dedicated case-management team; 2) provide access to more in-depth and meaningful training for providers, clinic staff, and administrative staff (and mandate certain basic training); and 3) allocate financial resources and enforce a policy of nondiscrimination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.