Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33635598›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2021

Detection of tumor-derived cell-free DNA from colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases in plasma and peritoneal fluid.

Iris Van't Erve, Koen P Rovers, Alexander Constantinides, Karen Bolhuis, Emma Ce Wassenaar, Robin J Lurvink, Clément J Huysentruyt, Petur Snaebjornsson, Djamila Boerma, Daan van den Broek and 9 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treatment Response Evaluation by Ultra-Deep Sequencing of Cell-Free DNA and Matched White Blood Cells.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Advances in laboratory medicine · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. The Landscape of ctDNA in Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Iris Van't ErveDepartment of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Koen P RoversDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Alexander ConstantinidesDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Division of Imaging and Cancer, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Karen BolhuisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Emma Ce WassenaarDepartment of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Robin J LurvinkDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Clément J HuysentruytDepartment of Pathology, Laboratory for Pathology and Medical Microbiology (PAMM), Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Petur SnaebjornssonDepartment of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Djamila BoermaDepartment of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Daan van den BroekDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tineke E BuffartDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Max J LahayeDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arend Gj AalbersDepartment of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Niels Fm KokDepartment of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gerrit A MeijerDepartment of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cornelis Ja PuntDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Onno KranenburgDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Division of Imaging and Cancer, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ignace Hjt de HinghDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Remond Ja FijnemanDepartment of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2076-5521

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor-derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is an emerging biomarker for guiding the personalized treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). While patients with CRC liver metastases (CRC-LM) have relatively high levels of plasma cfDNA, little is known about patients with CRC peritoneal metastases (CRC-PM). This study evaluated the presence of tumor-derived cfDNA in plasma and peritoneal fluid (i.e. ascites or peritoneal washing) in 20 patients with isolated CRC-PM and in the plasma of 100 patients with isolated CRC-LM. Among tumor tissue KRAS/BRAF mutation carriers, tumor-derived cfDNA was detected by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) in plasma of 93% of CRC-LM and 20% of CRC-PM patients and in peritoneal fluid in all CRC-PM patients. Mutant allele fraction (MAF) and mutant copies per ml (MTc/ml) were lower in CRC-PM plasma than in CRC-LM plasma (median MAF = 0.28 versus 18.9%, p < 0.0001; median MTc/ml = 21 versus 1,758, p < 0.0001). Within patients with CRC-PM, higher cfDNA levels were observed in peritoneal fluid than in plasma (median MAF = 16.4 versus 0.28%, p = 0.0019; median MTc/ml = 305 versus 21, p = 0.0034). These data imply that tumor-derived cfDNA in plasma is a poor biomarker to monitor CRC-PM. Instead, cfDNA detection in peritoneal fluid may offer an alternative to guide CRC-PM treatment decisions.

Indexed as

AgedAscitic FluidBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAClinical Decision-MakingColorectal NeoplasmsDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleHumansLiquid BiopsyMaleMiddle AgedMutationNetherlandsPeritoneal NeoplasmsPolymerase Chain ReactionBiomarkers, TumorBRAF protein, humanCirculating Tumor DNAKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ascitic fluidbiomarkerscirculating tumor DNAcolorectal neoplasmsliquid biopsyperitoneumplasma

Identifiers

PMID33635598
PMCPMC8073000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.