Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33635562›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2021

Demographics and travel history of imported and autochthonous cases of leishmaniosis in dogs in the United States and Canada, 2006 to 2019.

Taylor Estes Gin, Erin Lashnits, James M Wilson, Edward B Breitschwerdt, Barbara Qurollo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Possibility ofCurrent tropical medicine reports · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Taylor Estes GinDepartment of Clinical sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2508-7929
Erin LashnitsDepartment of Clinical sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0949-5698
James M WilsonVector-Borne Disease Diagnostic Lab, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States.
Edward B BreitschwerdtInternal Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3506-0279
Barbara QurolloDepartment of Clinical sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9849-2511
North Carolina State University · US

Funding

Comparative Medicine and Translational Research Training ProgramT32OD011130 · OD · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Lauren Virginia Schnabel · 2012 to 2026
$7.8M
NIH HHS T32 OD011130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeishmania infantum infections are reported in foxhounds throughout the United States (US) and Canada, but only rarely in other dog breeds. A seroprevalence report from 2006 documented leishmaniosis in foxhounds (8.9%) tested in the US between 2000 and 2003. All other breeds were seronegative.

objectiveTo reexamine demographics and travel history of L. infantum-infected dogs in the US and Canada, we hypothesize detection of L. infantum in more foxhounds than nonfoxhounds and that infected nonfoxhounds will have traveled to endemic regions. ANIMALS: A total of 125 dogs positive for L. infantum by immunofluorescent antibody, PCR, or both.

methodsRetrospective, descriptive study of L. infantum-infected dogs between 4 January 2006 and 22 May 2019. Travel history and known lineage to foxhounds was collected from questionnaires.

resultsLeishmania infantum was detected in 125 (6.4%) of 1961 dogs tested between 4 January 2006 and 22 May 2019, of which 10 (8%) were foxhounds and 115 (92%) were nonfoxhound breeds. Travel history available for 69 (55%) dogs showed 60 (86.9%) dogs had traveled outside of the US or Canada. Nine (13%) dogs had not traveled outside of the US or Canada, 5 of which were nonfoxhounds. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The majority of L. infantum cases were detected in nonfoxhounds, many of which had traveled to L. infantum-endemic countries, and several nonfoxhound breeds had no travel history. Leishmania surveillance should be considered for dogs that return from L. infantum-endemic regions to monitor emergence of this zoonotic disease in the US and Canada.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesLeishmania infantumAnimalsCanadaDemographyDogsRetrospective StudiesSeroepidemiologic StudiesUnited Statesdogleishmanialutzomyia

Identifiers

PMID33635562
PMCPMC7995368
OpenAlexW3129652460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.