Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33635546›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical pharmacology2021

The Interplay Between the Immune System, the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS), and RAAS Inhibitors May Modulate the Outcome of COVID-19: A Systematic Review.

Hiba Naveed, Abdallah Elshafeey, Dana Al-Ali, Emmad Janjua, Areej Nauman, Hussam Kawas, Ridhima Kaul, Arwa Saed Aldien, Mohamed B Elshazly, Dalia Zakaria

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hiba NaveedWeill Cornell Medicine Qatar, Qatar Foundation, Education City, Doha, Qatar.
Abdallah ElshafeeyWeill Cornell Medicine Qatar, Qatar Foundation, Education City, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0001-7128-2701
Dana Al-AliWeill Cornell Medicine Qatar, Qatar Foundation, Education City, Doha, Qatar.
Emmad JanjuaWeill Cornell Medicine Qatar, Qatar Foundation, Education City, Doha, Qatar.
Areej NaumanWeill Cornell Medicine Qatar, Qatar Foundation, Education City, Doha, Qatar.
Hussam KawasWeill Cornell Medicine Qatar, Qatar Foundation, Education City, Doha, Qatar.
Ridhima KaulWeill Cornell Medicine Qatar, Qatar Foundation, Education City, Doha, Qatar.
Arwa Saed AldienWeill Cornell Medicine Qatar, Qatar Foundation, Education City, Doha, Qatar.
Mohamed B ElshazlyWeill Cornell Medicine Qatar, Qatar Foundation, Education City, Doha, Qatar.
Dalia ZakariaWeill Cornell Medicine Qatar, Qatar Foundation, Education City, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0001-9020-0038

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the discovery of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), numerous research has been undertaken to delineate the various effects of the virus which manifests in many ways all over the body. The association between the SARS-CoV-2 invasion mechanism and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) receptors, created many debates about the possible consequences of using RAAS-modulating drugs including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) during the pandemic. Many clinical studies were conducted to assess the outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients who use ACEi/ARBs following the arguments claiming to discontinue these drugs as a precautionary measure. Although several studies mainly analyzed the outcomes of the disease, this review aimed to compare specific blood markers in both groups of COVID-19 patients to gain better insight into the interaction of ACEi/ARBs with different body functions during the infection. Several databases were searched using a combination of keywords followed by screening and data extraction. Only 28 studies met our inclusion criteria, the majority of which showed no significant difference between the inflammation markers of COVID-19 patients who used or did not use ACEi/ARBs. Interestingly, 6 studies reported lower inflammatory markers in COVID-19 patients who used ACEi/ARBs, and 6 studies reported better outcomes among the same group. We therefore concluded that the use of ACEi/ARBs may not lead to worse prognosis of COVID-19 and may even play a protective role against the hyperinflammatory response associated with COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19ImmunityAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsHumansPrognosisProtective FactorsRenin-Angiotensin SystemSARS-CoV-2Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAngiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitorsangiotensin receptor blockerscoronavirusCOVID-19renin angiotensin aldosterone system

Identifiers

PMID33635546
PMCPMC8014479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.