Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33635507›Full record

ReviewPain and therapy2021

Pain, Smell, and Taste in Adults: A Narrative Review of Multisensory Perception and Interaction.

Angela Sandri, Maria Paola Cecchini, Marianna Riello, Alice Zanini, Riccardo Nocini, Mirta Fiorio, Michele Tinazzi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Taste-taste associations in chemotherapy-induced subjective taste alterations: findings from a questionnaire survey in an outpatient clinic.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Migraine with aura: less control over pain and fragrances?The journal of headache and pain · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Angela Sandri *Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. angela.sandri_01@univr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0462-3945
Maria Paola Cecchini *Anatomy and Histology Section, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Marianna RielloNeurology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Alice ZaniniAnatomy and Histology Section, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Riccardo NociniOtolaryngology Section, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Paediatrics and Gynaecology , University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Mirta Fiorio *Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Michele Tinazzi *Neurology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. michele.tinazzi@univr.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Every day our sensory systems perceive and integrate a variety of stimuli containing information vital for our survival. Pain acts as a protective warning system, eliciting a response to remove harmful stimuli; it may also be a symptom of an illness or present as a disease itself. There is a growing need for additional pain-relieving therapies involving the multisensory integration of smell and taste in pain modulation, an approach that may provide new strategies for the treatment and management of pain. While pain, smell, and taste share common features and are strongly linked to emotion and cognition, their interaction has been poorly explored. In this review, we provide an overview of the literature on pain modulation by olfactory and gustatory substances. It includes adult human studies investigating measures of pain threshold, tolerance, intensity, and/or unpleasantness. Due to the limited number of studies currently available, we have structured this review as a narrative in which we comment on experimentally induced and clinical pain separately on pain-smell and pain-taste interaction. Inconsistent study findings notwithstanding, pain, smell, and taste seem to interact at both the behavioral and the neural levels. Pain intensity and unpleasantness seem to be affected more by olfactory substances, whereas pain threshold and tolerance are influenced by gustatory substances. Few pilot studies to date have investigated these effects in clinical populations. While the current results are promising for the future, more evidence is needed to elucidate the link between the chemical senses and pain. Doing so has the potential to improve and develop novel options for pain treatment.

Indexed as

Experimental and clinical painOlfactory and gustatory substancesPain analgesiaPain managementPain relief

Identifiers

PMID33635507
PMCPMC8119564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.