ArticleJournal of gambling studies2021
Public Perceptions of Harm for Nine Popular Gambling Products.
Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceived Riskiness and Problem Gambling Across Different Forms of Gambling: A Focus on 'Soft' Gambling.Journal of gambling studies · 2025Article
- The expansion of gambling across the Americas poses risks to mental health and wellbeing.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2024Review
- Harmful types of gambling: changes and emerging trends in longitudinal helpline data.European journal of public health · 2024Article
- Availability restrictions and mandatory precommitment in land-based gambling: effects on online substitutes and total consumption in longitudinal sales data.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Gambling harm prevention and harm reduction in online environments: a call for action.Harm reduction journal · 2023Review
- Minding the consumer mindsets in addressing gambling consumption harms.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gambling causes significant levels of harm globally and is recognised as a serious public health issue. To reduce gambling-related harm, various strategies and policies have been recommended, including decreasing the availability of gambling products, restricting gambling advertising, and implementing public education campaigns. Government willingness to implement such strategies will be influenced by levels of public support, which in turn will be dependent on public perceptions of the harm caused by gambling products. The aim of the present study was to assess public perceptions of the harm associated with individual gambling products to inform future gambling reform. A sample of 2112 Australian adults provided perceived harm ratings for nine popular gambling products that are known to be associated with gambling-related harm: electronic gambling machines, casino table games, sports betting, bingo, scratch tickets, private betting, horse/dog races, keno, and the lottery. Binary logistic regressions were used to identify factors associated with harm perceptions. Only electronic gambling machines (70%), casino table games (64%), betting on horse/dog races (59%), and sports betting (53%) were perceived by a majority of respondents as being harmful. Less frequent gambling and experiencing greater levels of gambling-related harm were associated with higher harm perceptions. Many potentially harmful gambling products may not be recognised as such by the public, which is likely to reduce support for recommended harm-reduction strategies and policies. Efforts are needed to ensure Australians in general and gamblers in particular understand the levels of harm associated with popular gambling products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33635504What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.