Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33635501›Full record

ArticleTheory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften2021

Quantifying the impact of network structure on speed and accuracy in collective decision-making.

Bryan C Daniels, Pawel Romanczuk

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bryan C DanielsASU-SFI Center for Biosocial Complex Systems, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA. bryan.daniels.1@asu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5870-1059
Pawel RomanczukInstitute for Theoretical Biology, Department of Biology, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 390523135Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft RO4766/2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Found in varied contexts from neurons to ants to fish, binary decision-making is one of the simplest forms of collective computation. In this process, information collected by individuals about an uncertain environment is accumulated to guide behavior at the aggregate scale. We study binary decision-making dynamics in networks responding to inputs with small signal-to-noise ratios, looking for quantitative measures of collectivity that control performance in this task. We find that decision accuracy is directly correlated with the speed of collective dynamics, which is in turn controlled by three factors: the leading eigenvalue of the network adjacency matrix, the corresponding eigenvector's participation ratio, and distance from the corresponding symmetry-breaking bifurcation. A novel approximation of the maximal attainable timescale near such a bifurcation allows us to predict how decision-making performance scales in large networks based solely on their spectral properties. Specifically, we explore the effects of localization caused by the hierarchical assortative structure of a "rich club" topology. This gives insight into the trade-offs involved in the higher-order structure found in living networks performing collective computations.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalDecision MakingAnimalsAntsCollective computationNeural networksRich clubStochastic dynamical systemsSymmetry-breaking transition

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.