Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33635497›Full record

ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis2021

Longitudinal CTCs gene expression analysis on metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with docetaxel reveals new potential prognosis markers.

Thais Pereira-Veiga, Miriam González-Conde, Luis León-Mateos, Roberto Piñeiro-Cid, Carmen Abuín, Laura Muinelo-Romay, Mónica Martínez-Fernández, Jenifer Brea Iglesias, Jorge García González, Urbano Anido and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Thais Pereira-VeigaRoche-Chus Joint Unit, Translational Medical Oncology Group, Oncomet, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Travesía da Choupana s/n, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Miriam González-CondeRoche-Chus Joint Unit, Translational Medical Oncology Group, Oncomet, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Travesía da Choupana s/n, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Luis León-MateosMedical Oncology Department, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Roberto Piñeiro-CidRoche-Chus Joint Unit, Translational Medical Oncology Group, Oncomet, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Travesía da Choupana s/n, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Carmen AbuínRoche-Chus Joint Unit, Translational Medical Oncology Group, Oncomet, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Travesía da Choupana s/n, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Laura Muinelo-RomayCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cáncer, CIBERONC, 28029, Madrid, Spain.
Mónica Martínez-FernándezGenomes and Disease Lab. CIMUS, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (USC), Avda. Barcelona 31, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Jenifer Brea IglesiasGenomes and Disease Lab. CIMUS, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (USC), Avda. Barcelona 31, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Jorge García GonzálezMedical Oncology Department, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Urbano AnidoMedical Oncology Department, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Santiago Aguín-LosadaMedical Oncology Department, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Víctor CebeyMedical Oncology Department, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Clotilde CostaRoche-Chus Joint Unit, Translational Medical Oncology Group, Oncomet, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Travesía da Choupana s/n, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. Clotilde.costa.nogueira@sergas.es.ORCID 0000-0001-7327-2259
Rafael López-LópezRoche-Chus Joint Unit, Translational Medical Oncology Group, Oncomet, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Travesía da Choupana s/n, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CTCs have extensively been used for the monitoring and characterization of metastatic prostate cancer, but their application in the clinic is still very scarce. Besides, the resistance mechanisms linked to prostate cancer treatment remain unclear. Liquid biopsies represent the most promising alternative due to the complexity of biopsying bone metastasis and the duration of the disease. We performed a prospective longitudinal study in CTCs from 20 castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with docetaxel. For that, we used CellSearch® technology and a custom gene expression panel with qRT-PCR using a CTCs negative enrichment approach. We found that CTCs showed a hybrid phenotype during the disease, where epithelial features were associated with the presence of ≥ 5 CTCs/7.5 mL of blood, while high relative expression of the gene MYCL was observed preferentially in the set of samples with < 5 CTCs/7.5 mL of blood. At baseline, patients whose CTCs had stem or hybrid features showed a later progression. After 1 cycle of docetaxel, high relative expression of ZEB1 indicated worse outcome, while KRT19 and KLK3 high expression could predisposed the patients to a worse prognosis at clinical progression. In the present work we describe biomarkers with clinical relevance for the prediction of early response or resistance in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. Besides, we question the utility of targeted isolated CTCs and the use of a limited number of markers to define the CTCs population.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAgedAged, 80 and overCell CountDocetaxelEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingPrognosisProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycZinc Finger E-box-Binding Homeobox 1DocetaxelMYCL protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycZEB1 protein, humanZinc Finger E-box-Binding Homeobox 1BiomarkersCRPCCTCsEMTLiquid biopsyProstate cancerTaxanes

Identifiers

PMID33635497
PMCPMC7987626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.