Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33635495›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2022

Central venous pressure swing outperforms diaphragm ultrasound as a measure of inspiratory effort during pressure support ventilation in COVID-19 patients.

Sergio Lassola, Sara Miori, Andrea Sanna, Alberto Cucino, Sandra Magnoni, Michele Umbrello

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sergio LassolaSC Anestesia e Rianimazione 1, Ospedale Santa Chiara, Trento, Italy.
Sara MioriSC Anestesia e Rianimazione 1, Ospedale Santa Chiara, Trento, Italy.
Andrea SannaSC Anestesia e Rianimazione 1, Ospedale Santa Chiara, Trento, Italy.
Alberto CucinoSC Anestesia e Rianimazione 1, Ospedale Santa Chiara, Trento, Italy.
Sandra MagnoniSC Anestesia e Rianimazione 1, Ospedale Santa Chiara, Trento, Italy.
Michele UmbrelloSC Anestesia e Rianimazione II, Ospedale San Carlo Borromeo, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milano, Italy. michele.umbrello@asst-santipaolocarlo.it.ORCID 0000-0003-4356-3543
Ospedale Santa Chiara · ITAOL (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe COVID-19-related shortage of ICU beds magnified the need of tools to properly titrate the ventilator assistance. We investigated whether bedside-available indices such as the ultrasonographic changes in diaphragm thickening ratio (TR) and the tidal swing in central venous pressure (ΔCVP) are reliable estimates of inspiratory effort, assessed as the tidal swing in esophageal pressure (ΔPes).

methodsProspective, observational clinical investigation in the intensive care unit of a tertiary care Hospital. Fourteen critically-ill patients were enrolled (age 64 ± 7 years, BMI 29 ± 4 kg/m

resultsThe reduction of pressure support was associated with an increased respiratory rate and a reduced tidal volume, while minute ventilation was unchanged. ΔPes significantly increased with reducing support (5 [3; 8] vs. 8 [14; 13] vs. 12 [6; 16] cmH

conclusionsIn patients with COVID-19-associated respiratory failure undergoing assisted mechanical ventilation, ΔCVP is a better estimate of inspiratory effort than diaphragm ultrasound.

Indexed as

COVID-19DiaphragmAgedCentral Venous PressureHumansMiddle AgedPositive-Pressure RespirationProspective StudiesRespiration, ArtificialCOVID-19Diaphragm ultrasoundEsophageal pressurePressure support ventilationWeaning

Identifiers

PMID33635495
PMCPMC7908005
OpenAlexW3129743882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.