ArticleInternational ophthalmology2021
Visual evoked potentials changes with surgery in primary congenital glaucoma: a pilot study.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo report the flash visual evoked potential (VEP) findings in children with primary congenital glaucoma (PCG) before and after successful surgical control of the intraocular pressure (IOP).
methodsThe study enrolled children presenting with PCG to the Ophthalmology Department of Alexandria Main University Hospital in the period between June and December 2019. All study participants were subjected to a standard protocol of examination, to confirm the diagnosis of PCG. The child was then referred for flash VEP testing. Peaks were designated as negative and positive waves in a numerical sequence (N1, P1, N2, P2, N3 and P3). The child was then scheduled for surgery within 1 week of presentation. Postoperative VEP testing was scheduled as soon as feasible and was conducted in the same way as the preoperative VEP testing.
resultsThe study was conducted on 11 (four right) eyes of eight (five males) children. The mean ± standard deviation of the age of the study children at presentation and at postoperative VEP testing was 3.5 ± 1.6 and 5.1 ± 3.0 months, respectively. The study eyes mean ± standard deviation IOP at presentation and at postoperative VEP testing was 23.0 ± 6.7 and 8.3 ± 2.4 mmHg, respectively (p < 0.0001). There were a statistically insignificant reduction in P2 implicit time (p = 0.235) and a statistically insignificant increase in each of N1-P1 (p = 0.15) and N2-P2 (p = 0.67) amplitudes postoperatively than preoperatively.
conclusionsIOP elevation in PCG adversely affects the optic nerve function, but, at least in the short term, has no permanent detrimental effect on the optic nerve function as evidenced by the improvement in the VEP parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.