Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33635397›Full record

SynthesisClinical oral investigations2021

Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Adrià Jorba-García, Albert González-Barnadas, Octavi Camps-Font, Rui Figueiredo, Eduard Valmaseda-Castellón

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 74 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
23.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05512845 completednot on this map

The Double Factor Technique: a Computer-guided Implant Surgery Technique for Fully Edentulous Patients

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAdrià Jorba GarcíaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled10ConditionsSurgery, Computer-Assisted, Dental ImplantsArmsDouble Factor technique
NCT06028750 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement Using Dynamic Navigation or the Freehand Method: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial in Novice Operators

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BarcelonaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsDental ImplantsArmsDynamic Computer Assisted Surgery, Freehand
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 186 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Adrià Jorba-GarcíaFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Albert González-BarnadasFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Octavi Camps-FontFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Rui FigueiredoFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. ruipfigueiredo@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2122-6530
Eduard Valmaseda-CastellónFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Institut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ESBellvitge University Hospital · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the accuracy of dynamic computer-aided implant surgery (dCAIS) systems when used to place dental implants and to compare its accuracy with static computer-aided implant surgery (sCAIS) systems and freehand implant placement. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn electronic search was made to identify all relevant studies reporting on the accuracy of dCAIS systems for dental implant placement. The following PICO question was developed: "In patients or artificial models, is dental implant placement accuracy higher when dCAIS systems are used in comparison with sCAIS systems or with freehand placement? The main outcome variable was angular deviation between the central axes of the planned and final position of the implant. The data were extracted in descriptive tables, and a meta-analysis of single means was performed in order to estimate the deviations for each variable using a random-effects model.

resultsOut of 904 potential articles, the 24 selected assessed 9 different dynamic navigation systems. The mean angular and entry 3D global deviations for clinical studies were 3.68° (95% CI: 3.61 to 3.74; I

conclusiondCAIS systems allow highly accurate implant placement with a mean angular of less than 4°. However, a 2-mm safety margin should be applied, since deviations of more than 1 mm were observed. dCAIS systems increase the implant placement accuracy when compared with freehand implant placement and also seem to slightly decrease the angular deviation in comparison with sCAIS systems. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of dCAIS could reduce the rate of complications since it allows a highly accurate implant placement.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsSurgery, Computer-AssistedComputer-Aided DesignComputersCone-Beam Computed TomographyDental Implantation, EndosseousHumansMargins of ExcisionDental ImplantsComputer-guided implantologyDental implantsDynamic computer-assisted surgeryNavigation systems

Identifiers

PMID33635397
OpenAlexW3131255551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.