Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33635383›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of applied physiology2021

State-of-the-art review: spinal and supraspinal responses to muscle potentiation in humans.

Alexander M Zero, Charles L Rice

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of applied physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander M ZeroFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Kinesiology, The University of Western Ontario, Arthur and Sonia Labatt Health Sciences Building, London, ON, N6A 5B9, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7962-4147
Charles L RiceFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Kinesiology, The University of Western Ontario, Arthur and Sonia Labatt Health Sciences Building, London, ON, N6A 5B9, Canada. crice@uwo.ca.
Western University · CA

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 180970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-activation potentiation (PAP), described as a muscular phenomenon, refers to the enhancement of contractile properties following a voluntary or electrically stimulated short duration (< 10 s) high-intensity contraction. Mechanistic factors and subsequent effects on voluntary performance have been well documented. Associations between neural activation and PAP, however, are less understood and systematically have not been explored. Thus, the aim is to critically summarize the current understanding of PAP regarding the motor pathway from the corticospinal tract to spinal level factors including the H-reflex and motor unit activation. This review highlights aspects for further investigation by providing an integrative summary of the relationship between PAP and neural control. Contractile history affects neural control in subsequent contractions, (e.g. fatiguing tasks), however, by contrast acute contractile enhancement due to PAP in relation to neural responses are not well-studied. From the limited number of investigations, motor unit discharge rates are reduced subsequent to PAP and, although less consistently reported, generally H-reflexes are depressed. Additionally, corticomedullary evoked potentials are depressed and the cortical silent period is elongated. Thus, overall there is a depression of spinal and supraspinal responses following PAP. Although specific factors responsible and their pathways are unclear, this down-regulation may occur to conserve neural activation when muscle contraction is more responsive, and concurrently a strategy used to delay neuromuscular fatigue. Indeed, the co-existence of PAP and fatigue is not a novel concept, but the interactions between PAP and neural responses are not understood and likely are more than coincidental.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, MotorH-ReflexHumansMuscle ContractionMuscle FatigueMuscle, SkeletalPyramidal TractsReaction TimeCorticospinalH-reflexMotor unitNeuromuscularPost-activation potentiation

Identifiers

PMID33635383
OpenAlexW3133153497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.