ReviewEuropean journal of applied physiology2021
State-of-the-art review: spinal and supraspinal responses to muscle potentiation in humans.
Review in European journal of applied physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effect of Three Work-Equivalent Whole-Body Vibration Protocols on Acute Neuromuscular Performance in Highly Trained Adolescent Soccer Players.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2026Article
- Neuromuscular Fatigue and Perceived Fatigability in the Hours Following a High-Intensity Endurance Running Depend on the Exercise Protocol.European journal of sport science · 2026Article
- Acute effects of predominantly inertial load-induced post-activation potentiation on upper-body muscle mechanics: implications for racket sports performance.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Concomitant effects of fatigue and potentiation in rat medial gastrocnemius fast motor units.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Posttetanic potentiation improves neuromuscular efficiency of mouse muscle in vitro.Physiological reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Post-activation potentiation (PAP), described as a muscular phenomenon, refers to the enhancement of contractile properties following a voluntary or electrically stimulated short duration (< 10 s) high-intensity contraction. Mechanistic factors and subsequent effects on voluntary performance have been well documented. Associations between neural activation and PAP, however, are less understood and systematically have not been explored. Thus, the aim is to critically summarize the current understanding of PAP regarding the motor pathway from the corticospinal tract to spinal level factors including the H-reflex and motor unit activation. This review highlights aspects for further investigation by providing an integrative summary of the relationship between PAP and neural control. Contractile history affects neural control in subsequent contractions, (e.g. fatiguing tasks), however, by contrast acute contractile enhancement due to PAP in relation to neural responses are not well-studied. From the limited number of investigations, motor unit discharge rates are reduced subsequent to PAP and, although less consistently reported, generally H-reflexes are depressed. Additionally, corticomedullary evoked potentials are depressed and the cortical silent period is elongated. Thus, overall there is a depression of spinal and supraspinal responses following PAP. Although specific factors responsible and their pathways are unclear, this down-regulation may occur to conserve neural activation when muscle contraction is more responsive, and concurrently a strategy used to delay neuromuscular fatigue. Indeed, the co-existence of PAP and fatigue is not a novel concept, but the interactions between PAP and neural responses are not understood and likely are more than coincidental.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.