Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33635008›Full record

ReviewYonsei medical journal2021

Optimal Complete Rectum Mobilization Focused on the Anatomy of the Pelvic Fascia and Autonomic Nerves: 30 Years of Experience at Severance Hospital.

Nam Kyu Kim, Ho Seung Kim, Mohmmed Alessa, Radwan Torky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Yonsei medical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Elderly Rectal Cancer: An Updated Review.Current oncology reports · 2024
    Review
  3. The Mesentery in Robot-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nam Kyu KimDepartment of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. namkyuk@yuhs.ac.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0639-5632
Ho Seung KimDepartment of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7378-0584
Mohmmed AlessaDepartment of Surgery, King Faisal University, Alahsa, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2716-5484
Radwan TorkyDepartment of Surgery, Assiut University College of Medicine, Assiut, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9907-6133

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary goal of surgery for rectal cancer is to achieve an oncologically safe resection, i.e., a radical resection with a sufficient safe margin. Total mesorectal excision has been introduced for radical surgery of rectal cancer and has yielded greatly improved oncologic outcomes in terms of local recurrence and cancer-specific survival. Along with oncologic outcomes, functional outcomes, such as voiding and sexual function, have also been emphasized in patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery to improve quality of life. Intraoperative nerve damage or combined excision is the primary reason for sexual and urinary dysfunction. In the past, these forms of damage could be attributed to the lack of anatomical knowledge and poor visualization of the pelvic autonomic nerve. With the adoption of minimally invasive surgery, visualization of nerve structure and meticulous dissection for the mesorectum are now possible. As the leading hospital employing this technique, we have adopted minimally invasive platforms (laparoscopy, robot-assisted surgery) in the field of rectal cancer surgery and standardized this technique globally. Here, we review a standardized technique for rectal cancer surgery based on our experience at Severance Hospital, suggest some practical technical tips, and discuss a couple of debatable issues in this field.

Indexed as

HospitalsAnatomic LandmarksAutonomic PathwaysFasciaHumansPelvisRectumanatomyrainbow techniquerectal cancerTotal mesorectal excision

Identifiers

PMID33635008
PMCPMC7934104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.