Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33634869›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of cancer2021

Low-dose pembrolizumab in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Jia Li Low, Yiqing Huang, Kenneth Sooi, Yvonne Ang, Zhi Yao Chan, Katie Spencer, Anand Devaprasath Jeyasekharan, Raghav Sundar, Boon Cher Goh, Ross Soo and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05175235 phase1 / phase2unknown statusnot on this map

Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab Dose Optimisation in Solid Tumours With CURATE.AI Platform and Sequential ctDNA Measurements

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational University Hospital, SingaporeRan2021 to 2023Enrolled10ConditionsSolid TumorArmsCURATE.AI, Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab
NCT06670911 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Phase II Trial of Low-dose Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy for the First-Line Treatment of Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer - ACCESS I

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto Nacional de Cancer, BrazilRan2025 to 2028Enrolled44ConditionsPersistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical CancerArmsLow-dose Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy (Paclitaxel plus Carboplatin or Cisplatin)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Comparative effectiveness of two alternative dosing strategies of pembrolizumab in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer in a real-world setting.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jia Li LowDepartment of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore (NCIS), Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-2215-0056
Yiqing HuangDepartment of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore (NCIS), Singapore, Singapore.
Kenneth SooiDepartment of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore (NCIS), Singapore, Singapore.
Yvonne AngDepartment of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore (NCIS), Singapore, Singapore.
Zhi Yao ChanDepartment of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore (NCIS), Singapore, Singapore.
Katie SpencerLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Anand Devaprasath JeyasekharanDepartment of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore (NCIS), Singapore, Singapore.
Raghav SundarDepartment of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore (NCIS), Singapore, Singapore.
Boon Cher GohDepartment of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore (NCIS), Singapore, Singapore.
Ross SooDepartment of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore (NCIS), Singapore, Singapore.
Wei Peng YongDepartment of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore (NCIS), Singapore, Singapore.
National University Cancer Institute, Singapore · SGUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A dose of 200 mg 3-weekly of pembrolizumab was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without oncogenic drivers. This is despite evidence showing no difference in efficacy with 2 mg/kg. Our study aimed to assess the efficacy of a lower fixed dose of 100 mg, which is closer to 2 mg/kg weight-based dose in an average-sized Asian patient. All patients receiving pembrolizumab for advanced NSCLC from January 2016 to March 2020 in National University Hospital, Singapore, were included in this retrospective observational study. The effect of pembrolizumab 100 mg (Pem100) vs 200 mg (Pem200) upon survival outcomes, toxicity and cost were examined. One hundred fourteen patients received pembrolizumab. Sixty-five (57%) and 49 (43%) received Pem100 and Pem200, respectively. There was no difference in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between Pem100 vs Pem200 as a single agent (PFS: 6.8 vs 4.2 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-1.46, P = .36; 9 month OS: 58% vs 63%, HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.48-2.41, P = .86) and when combined with chemotherapy (9-month PFS: 60% vs 50%, HR0.84, 95% CI 0.34-2.08, P = .71; 9-month OS: 85% vs 58%, HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.062-1.20, P = .09). No significant difference in response rate or ≥G3 immune-related toxicities between Pem100 and Pem200 was observed. A cost minimisation analysis evaluating the degree of cost savings related to drug costs estimated a within study cost saving of SGD4,290,912 and cost saving per patient of SGD39,942 in the Pem100 group. A 100 mg of pembrolizumab appears to be effective with reduction in cost. A randomised trial should be done to investigate a lower dose of pembrolizumab.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalpembrolizumabAsialow dosenon-small cell lung cancerpembrolizumab

Identifiers

PMID33634869
PMCPMC9545741
OpenAlexW3131433923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.