Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33634722›Full record

ArticleSurgical innovation2021

Intraprocedural Artificial Intelligence for Colorectal Cancer Detection and Characterisation in Endoscopy and Laparoscopy.

Niall P Hardy, Pól Mac Aonghusa, Peter M Neary, Ronan A Cahill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical innovation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Digital surgery for gastroenterological diseases.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Niall P HardyUCD Centre for Precision Surgery, School of Medicine, 58041University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7036-3910
Pól Mac AonghusaHealthcare Research, 535630IBM Research, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7640-9668
Peter M NearyDepartment of Surgery, University College Cork, 8797University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9319-286X
Ronan A CahillUCD Centre for Precision Surgery, School of Medicine, 58041University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1270-4000

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, we provide an evidence-based primer of current tools and evolving concepts in the area of intraprocedural artificial intelligence (AI) methods in colonoscopy and laparoscopy as a 'procedure companion', with specific focus on colorectal cancer recognition and characterisation. These interventions are both likely beneficiaries from an impending rapid phase in technical and technological evolution. The domains where AI is most likely to impact are explored as well as the methodological pitfalls pertaining to AI methods. Such issues include the need for large volumes of data to train AI systems, questions surrounding false positive rates, explainability and interpretability as well as recent concerns surrounding instabilities in current deep learning (DL) models. The area of biophysics-inspired models, a potential remedy to some of these pitfalls, is explored as it could allow our understanding of the fundamental physiological differences between tissue types to be exploited in real time with the help of computer-assisted interpretation. Right now, such models can include data collected from dynamic fluorescence imaging in surgery to characterise lesions by their biology reducing the number of cases needed to build a reliable and interpretable classification system. Furthermore, instead of focussing on image-by-image analysis, such systems could analyse in a continuous fashion, more akin to how we view procedures in real life and make decisions in a manner more comparable to human decision-making. Synergistical approaches can ensure AI methods usefully embed within practice thus safeguarding against collapse of this exciting field of investigation as another 'boom and bust' cycle of AI endeavour.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsLaparoscopyArtificial IntelligenceColonoscopyEndoscopy, GastrointestinalHumansartificial intelligencebiophysics-inspired algorithmscolorectal diseasedecision support systemsfluorescence-guided surgerymachine learning

Identifiers

PMID33634722
PMCPMC8647474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.