ArticleSurgical innovation2021
Intraprocedural Artificial Intelligence for Colorectal Cancer Detection and Characterisation in Endoscopy and Laparoscopy.
Article in Surgical innovation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health economics evaluation of artificial intelligence in the field of oncology: a scoping review.Health economics review · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in colorectal cancer multidisciplinary decision-making: concordance, predictive support and clinical translation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Deep learning-based intraoperative visual guidance model for ureter identification in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Establishing and clinically validating a machine learning model for predicting unplanned reoperation risk in colorectal cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Quantification of fluorescence angiography for visceral perfusion assessment: measuring agreement between two software algorithms.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Vaginal microbiota molecular profiling and diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence-assisted multiplex PCR testing in women with bacterial vaginosis: a single-center experience.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
- Fluorescent Probes for Imaging in Humans: Where Are We Now?ACS nano · 2023Review
- Use of Near-Infrared Fluorescence Techniques in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Fluorescence-guided surgery: comprehensive review.BJS open · 2023Review
- Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of Early Colorectal Cancer.Visceral medicine · 2023Review
- Preoperative Immunocite-Derived Ratios Predict Surgical Complications Better when Artificial Neural Networks Are Used for Analysis-A Pilot Comparative Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- The adoption of artificial intelligence assisted endoscopy in the Middle East: challenges and future potential.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023Review
- Modern Machine Learning Practices in Colorectal Surgery: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Standardization and implementation of fluorescence molecular endoscopy in the clinic.Journal of biomedical optics · 2022Article
- Digital surgery for gastroenterological diseases.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Colorectal Cancer Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment. A New Era.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this article, we provide an evidence-based primer of current tools and evolving concepts in the area of intraprocedural artificial intelligence (AI) methods in colonoscopy and laparoscopy as a 'procedure companion', with specific focus on colorectal cancer recognition and characterisation. These interventions are both likely beneficiaries from an impending rapid phase in technical and technological evolution. The domains where AI is most likely to impact are explored as well as the methodological pitfalls pertaining to AI methods. Such issues include the need for large volumes of data to train AI systems, questions surrounding false positive rates, explainability and interpretability as well as recent concerns surrounding instabilities in current deep learning (DL) models. The area of biophysics-inspired models, a potential remedy to some of these pitfalls, is explored as it could allow our understanding of the fundamental physiological differences between tissue types to be exploited in real time with the help of computer-assisted interpretation. Right now, such models can include data collected from dynamic fluorescence imaging in surgery to characterise lesions by their biology reducing the number of cases needed to build a reliable and interpretable classification system. Furthermore, instead of focussing on image-by-image analysis, such systems could analyse in a continuous fashion, more akin to how we view procedures in real life and make decisions in a manner more comparable to human decision-making. Synergistical approaches can ensure AI methods usefully embed within practice thus safeguarding against collapse of this exciting field of investigation as another 'boom and bust' cycle of AI endeavour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.