Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33634620›Full record

ArticleJournal of breast cancer2021

Trends in Axillary Surgery for Treating Ductal Carcinoma

Young Duck Shin, Gilwon Kang, Hoyeon Jang, Young Jin Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of breast cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Young Duck ShinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8373-8478
Gilwon KangDepartment of Health Informatics and Management, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0222-1870
Hoyeon JangDepartment of Health Informatics and Management, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5446-7752
Young Jin ChoiDepartment of Surgery, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea. choiyj@chungbuk.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1030-4211

Funding

Chungbuk National University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDuctal carcinoma

methodsThe Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service-National Inpatient Sample database was searched for patients with DCIS (2009-2015) to identify axillary surgery patterns by breast surgery type, year of diagnosis, age at diagnosis, and the location and volume of surgeries for DCIS at the hospital. The rates of SLNB and axillary dissection were compared using descriptive statistics and univariate analyses. Analyses were also conducted using the chi-squared test and multiple logistic regression analysis.

resultsWe identified 16,315 Korean women who underwent surgery for DCIS, including 11,292 cases of SLNB (69.2%) and 131 cases of axillary lymph node dissection (0.8%). Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) was performed in 10,323 patients (63.3%) with an SLNB rate of 56.0%, while total mastectomy (TM) was performed in 5,992 patients (36.7%), with an SLNB rate of 92.0%. During 2009-2015, the SLNB rate during TM increased from 88.23% to 92.80%. SLNB was influenced by hospital region and surgical volume, and hospitals performing low volumes of surgeries were significantly more likely to perform SLNB regardless of the surgery type (odds ratio, 1.372; 95% confidence interval, 1.265-1.488).

conclusionAlthough the Korean guidelines recommend SLNB for all TM procedures and select BCS procedures for DCIS, relatively high rates of SLNB were performed for BCS, and there was inter-hospital variability in performing SLNB. Improved compliance with the guidelines by the surgeons is critical for Korean patients with DCIS.

Indexed as

Breast neoplasmsDuctal carcinoma in situGuidelineSentinel lymph node biopsy

Identifiers

PMID33634620
PMCPMC7920862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.