Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33634520›Full record

ArticleJournal of intellectual disability research : JIDR2021

COVID-19 impact on psychological outcomes of parents, siblings and children with intellectual disability: longitudinal before and during lockdown design.

T Bailey, R P Hastings, V Totsika

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05109026 (Connect-5 Needs Assessment to Identify Requirements of a Rural Irish Community Related to a an Online Digital Platform Solution, Designed to Change Behaviour, Related to Lifestyle Medicine and Mental Health.), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05109026 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Connect-5 Needs Assessment to Identify Requirements of a Rural Irish Community Related to a an Online Digital Platform Solution, Designed to Change Behaviour, Related to Lifestyle Medicine and Mental Health.

TypeobservationalSponsorRoyal College of Surgeons, IrelandRan2022 to 2023Enrolled228ConditionsHealthy Lifestyle
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

T BaileyCEDAR, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2300-0671
R P HastingsCEDAR, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0495-8270
V TotsikaCEDAR, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1702-2727
University of Warwick · GB

Funding

Cerebra (UK)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParents of children with intellectual disability (ID) report comparatively lower levels of well-being than parents of children without ID. Similarly, children with ID, and to a lesser extent their siblings, are reported to show comparatively higher levels of behaviour and emotional problems. Psychological problems may be accentuated by restrictions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, due to increased social, caring and economic stressors and reduced social support. However, existing studies have not been able to examine the impact of COVID-19 restrictions accounting for pre-COVID levels of well-being in these families. In a naturalistic design, we examined outcomes for parents, siblings and children with ID in a two-wave longitudinal study where Wave 2 data were gathered for some families before and some during COVID-19 restrictions.

methodsParents of children with ID who took part in a Wave 2 survey pre-lockdown (n = 294) and during/post-lockdown (n = 103) completed a number of measures about their well-being and the behaviour and emotional problems of both their child with ID and their nearest-in-age sibling. These same measures had also been completed for all families 2-3 years previously in Wave 1 of the study.

resultsAfter accounting for covariates including family socio-economic circumstances, pre-lockdown and post-lockdown groups did not differ on Waves 1 to 2 change for measures of parental psychological distress, life satisfaction, the impact of caregiving on their lives or perceived positive gains; nor child or sibling internalising or externalising behaviour problems.

conclusionsFindings of the current study indicate that during and shortly after the COVID-19 lockdown in the United Kingdom, well-being in families of children with an ID (as reported by parents) was at similar levels compared with prior to the lockdown period.

Indexed as

COVID-19Personal SatisfactionAdultChildChildren with DisabilitiesFemaleHumansIntellectual DisabilityLongitudinal StudiesMaleParentsSiblingsUnited KingdomcoronavirusCOVID-19externalising behaviourintellectual disabilityinternalising behaviourparental well-beingsiblings

Identifiers

PMID33634520
PMCPMC8013753
OpenAlexW3131550665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.