Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33634425›Full record

ArticlePaediatric drugs2021

Haloperidol and Quetiapine for the Treatment of ICU-Associated Delirium in a Tertiary Pediatric ICU: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.

Michael T Cronin, Jane L Di Gennaro, R Scott Watson, Leslie A Dervan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatric drugs, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael T CroninDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, M/S FA2.112, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jane L Di GennaroDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, M/S FA2.112, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA, USA.
R Scott WatsonDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, M/S FA2.112, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA, USA.
Leslie A DervanDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, M/S FA2.112, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA, USA. leslie.dervan@seattlechildrens.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4521-354X
University of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients with delirium treated with haloperidol or quetiapine compared with propensity-matched, untreated patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsA single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted including PICU admissions of ≥ 48 h for children ≥ 2 months old with a positive delirium screening score (Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium ≥ 9). We generated propensity scores for the likelihood of receiving treatment with haloperidol or quetiapine using logistic regression, and matched untreated to treated patients 2:1 to compare outcomes between groups.

resultsAmong 846 eligible admissions, 27 were treated with haloperidol or quetiapine (3.2%). Time to first delirium-free score was similar for treated versus untreated patients. Treated patients had no significant change in delirium scores following treatment, while untreated patients' scores improved after the comparable matching time. Compared with untreated patients, haloperidol-treated patients had more subsequent days of delirium and exposure to neuromuscular blockade. Quetiapine-treated patients had more subsequent days of mechanical ventilation and exposure to neuromuscular blockade, longer PICU length of stay, and higher likelihood of functional decline at ICU discharge.

conclusionsIn our small, single-center study, patients treated with haloperidol or quetiapine showed no short-term improvement in delirium screening scores after starting treatment when compared with untreated, propensity score-matched patients. In addition, clinical outcomes were not improved or were worse among treated patients. A prospective trial is needed to evaluate whether antipsychotic medications benefit PICU patients with delirium.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsChildCohort StudiesDeliriumFemaleHaloperidolHumansIntensive Care Units, PediatricMalePropensity ScoreQuetiapine FumarateRespiration, ArtificialRetrospective StudiesAntipsychotic AgentsHaloperidolQuetiapine Fumarate

Identifiers

PMID33634425
OpenAlexW3130514834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.