Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33634373›Full record

ArticleHepatology international2021

Checkpoint inhibitor induced hepatitis and the relation with liver metastasis and outcome in advanced melanoma patients.

Maaike Biewenga, Monique K van der Kooij, Michel W J M Wouters, Maureen J B Aarts, Franchette W P J van den Berkmortel, Jan Willem B de Groot, Marye J Boers-Sonderen, Geke A P Hospers, Djura Piersma, Rozemarijn S van Rijn and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatology international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Navigating liver toxicity in the age of novel oncological agents.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Function ofEJNMMI reports · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Maaike BiewengaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2797-6164
Monique K van der KooijDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Michel W J M WoutersDepartment of Medical and Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maureen J B AartsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Franchette W P J van den BerkmortelDepartment of Medical Oncology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
Jan Willem B de GrootIsala Oncology Centre, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Marye J Boers-SonderenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Geke A P HospersDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Djura PiersmaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Rozemarijn S van RijnDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
Karijn P M SuijkerbuijkCancer Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Albert J Ten TijeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
Astrid A M van der VeldtDepartments of Medical Oncology and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Gerard VreugdenhilDepartment of Internal Medicine, Maxima Medical Centre, Eindhoven/Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
John B A G HaanenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Alfons J M van der EertweghDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bart van Hoek *Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ellen Kapiteijn *Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands. h.w.kapiteijn@lumc.nl.
Leiden University · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLAmphia Ziekenhuis · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLIsala · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLMedisch Centrum Leeuwarden · NLMedisch Spectrum Twente · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLZuyderland Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

Nederlands Instituut voor Onderzoek van de Gezondheidszorg 836002002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCheckpoint inhibitor-induced hepatitis is an immune-related adverse event of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibition, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated 4 (CTLA-4) inhibition or the combination of both. Aim of this study was to assess whether checkpoint inhibitor-induced hepatitis is related to liver metastasis and outcome in a real-world nationwide cohort.

methodsData from the prospective nationwide Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry (DMTR) was used to analyze incidence, risk factors of checkpoint inhibitor-induced grade 3-4 hepatitis and outcome.

results2561 advanced cutaneous melanoma patients received 3111 treatments with checkpoint inhibitors between May 2012 and January 2019. Severe hepatitis occurred in 30/1620 (1.8%) patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors, in 29/1105 (2.6%) patients treated with ipilimumab and in 80/386 (20.7%) patients treated with combination therapy. Patients with hepatitis had a similar prevalence of liver metastasis compared to patients without hepatitis (32% vs. 27%; p = 0.58 for PD-1 inhibitors; 42% vs. 29%; p = 0.16 for ipilimumab; 38% vs. 43%; p = 0.50 for combination therapy). There was no difference in median progression free and overall survival between patients with and without hepatitis (6.0 months vs. 5.4 months progression-free survival; p = 0.61; 17.0 vs. 16.2 months overall survival; p = 0.44).

conclusionIncidence of hepatitis in a real-world cohort is 1.8% for PD-1 inhibitor, 2.6% for ipilimumab and 20.7% for combination therapy. Checkpoint inhibitor-induced hepatitis had no relation with liver metastasis and had no negative effect on the outcome.

Indexed as

HepatitisLiver NeoplasmsMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansNivolumabProspective StudiesNivolumabCTLA-4 inhibitorDrug-induced HepatitisImmune-related adverse eventsIpilimumabLiver metastasisNivolumabOverall survivalPD-1 inhibitorProgression-Free SurvivalRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID33634373
PMCPMC8144142
OpenAlexW3131365592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.