Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33634333›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2021

3D-surface scan based validated new measurement technique of femoral joint line reconstruction in total knee arthroplasty.

Lars-Rene Tuecking, Max Ettinger, Dennis Nebel, Bastian Welke, Michael Schwarze, Henning Windhagen, Peter Savov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparable accuracy of femoral joint line reconstruction in different kinematic and functional alignment techniques.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lars-Rene TueckingDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical School Hannover, Anna-von-Borries-Str. 1-7, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Max EttingerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical School Hannover, Anna-von-Borries-Str. 1-7, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Dennis NebelLaboratory for Biomechanics and Biomaterials, Medical School Hannover, Anna-von-Borries-Str. 1-7, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Bastian WelkeLaboratory for Biomechanics and Biomaterials, Medical School Hannover, Anna-von-Borries-Str. 1-7, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Michael SchwarzeLaboratory for Biomechanics and Biomaterials, Medical School Hannover, Anna-von-Borries-Str. 1-7, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Henning WindhagenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical School Hannover, Anna-von-Borries-Str. 1-7, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Peter SavovDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical School Hannover, Anna-von-Borries-Str. 1-7, 30625, Hannover, Germany. peter.savov@diakovere.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to validate a new joint line measurement technique in total knee arthroplasty for separated assessment of the medial and lateral femoral joint line alteration with 3D-surface scan technology. Separate assessment of the medial and lateral joint line alteration may improve TKA alignment assessment regarding to joint line restoration in kinematic alignment and use of robotic-assisted TKA surgery.

methodsThe medial and lateral joint line difference after TKA implantation on an artificial bone model was analyzed and compared with a 3D-scan and full femoral radiographs pre- and postoperatively. Radiographic analysis included the perpendicular distance between the most distal point of the medial and lateral condyle and the reproduced preoperative lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA). For evaluation of validity and reliability, radiographs were captured initially with true anteroposterior view and subsequently with combined flexion and rotation malpositioning. Reliability of the introduced measurement technique in between three observers was tested with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

resultsRadiographic measurement showed a mean difference of 0.9 mm on the medial side and 0.6 mm on the lateral side when compared to the 3D-surface scan measurement. The reliability of measurement accuracy was ≤ 1 mm in x-rays with < 10° flexion error regardless to malrotation in these images. The ICC test showed very good reliability for the medial joint line evaluation and good reliability for lateral joint line evaluation (ICC 0.92, ICC 0.86 respectively).

conclusionThe new introduced joint line measurement method showed a sufficient reliability, accuracy and precision. It provides separated information about medial and lateral joint line alteration in TKA surgery in absolute values. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V - Experimental Study.

Indexed as

Femoral mechanical angleJoint lineKinematic alignmentRadiographic assessmentTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID33634333
PMCPMC7907296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.