Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33634318›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022

Validation of AQoL-8D: a health-related quality of life questionnaire for adult patients referred for otolaryngology.

Anita Obrycka, Jose-Luis Padilla, Artur Lorens, Piotr Henryk Skarzynski, Henryk Skarzynski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Health-related quality of life in adults with profound postlingual hearing loss before and after cochlear implantation.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anita ObryckaWorld Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, ul. Mokra 17, Kajetany, Nadarzyn, 05-830, Warsaw, Poland. a.obrycka@ifps.org.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3053-229X
Jose-Luis PadillaMind, Brain and Research Centre, Dept. Methodology of Behavioral Sciences, School of Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4163-0001
Artur LorensWorld Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, ul. Mokra 17, Kajetany, Nadarzyn, 05-830, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8618-7651
Piotr Henryk SkarzynskiWorld Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, ul. Mokra 17, Kajetany, Nadarzyn, 05-830, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4978-1915
Henryk SkarzynskiWorld Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, ul. Mokra 17, Kajetany, Nadarzyn, 05-830, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7141-9851

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of the study was to validate the AQoL-8D questionnaire in the adult population of patients referred to an otolaryngology clinic.

methodsAQoL-8D was translated into Polish. 463 patients (age18-80 years) with otolaryngological conditions were assessed with the AQoL-8D, SF-6D, and SWLS questionnaires. We investigated the item content-relevance, factor structure by means of Confirmatory Factor Analysis, corrected item-total correlations, Cronbach's alpha, Pearson correlation of the AQoL-8D scores with results from SF-6D and from the SWLS questionnaires. Finally, ANOVA was used to test the AQoL-8D ability to group the HRQoL of patients in terms of their otolaryngological management type.

resultsThe median score of item content-relevance was 5.0 for all AQoL-8D items. Confirmatory Factor Analysis revealed the following fit indices: Comparative Fit Index = 0.81; Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.80; and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.07. Cronbach's alpha for AQoL-8D dimensions ranged from 0.48 to 0.79. Mean item-total correlations over all dimensions, super dimensions, and the instrument overall were higher than 0.3. There was a significant Pearson correlation between the results obtained with AQoL-8D and SF-6D (r = 0.68), and with AQoL-8D and SWLS (r = 0.43). A one-way ANOVA showed a significant effect of management type on HRQoL as measured by AQoL-8D [F(4,458) = 6.12, p < 0.001]

conclusionAQoL-8D provides valid and reliable measures of HRQoL in patients undergoing otolaryngological treatment. Because it is a generic questionnaire, it is possible to make general comparisons of otolaryngology outcomes with those from other subspecialties.

Indexed as

OtolaryngologyQuality of LifeAdultHumansPsychometricsReferral and ConsultationReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesHealth-related quality of lifeHearing impairmentOtolaryngologyPatient-reported outcome measuresValidation

Identifiers

PMID33634318
PMCPMC8795021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.