Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33634262›Full record

ArticleClinical pathology (Thousand Oaks, Ventura County, Calif.)

Standardized Assessment of the Tumor-Stroma Ratio in Colorectal Cancer: Interobserver Validation and Reproducibility of a Potential Prognostic Factor.

Ricella M Souza da Silva, Eduardo M Queiroga, Alexandre R Paz, Fabiana F P Neves, Karin S Cunha, Eliane P Dias

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pathology (Thousand Oaks, Ventura County, Calif.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Tumor-stroma ratio in colitis-associated colorectal cancer.Upsala journal of medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. The Role of Tumor Parenchymal and Stromal Ratios in Colorectal Cancer.Journal of family & reproductive health · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ricella M Souza da SilvaPostgraduation Program in Pathology, School of Medicine, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro,Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3860-6660
Eduardo M QueirogaLaboratory of Pathological Anatomy, Alcides Carneiro University Hospital of the Federal University of Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brazil.
Alexandre R PazPathological Anatomy Service, Lauro Wanderley University Hospital of Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.
Fabiana F P NevesAnatomopathological Diagnosis Center, Pathology Laboratory, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.
Karin S CunhaPostgraduation Program in Pathology, School of Medicine, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro,Brazil.
Eliane P DiasPostgraduation Program in Pathology, School of Medicine, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro,Brazil.
Universidade Federal Fluminense · BRUniversidade Federal da Paraíba · BRUniversidade Federal de Campina Grande · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tumor stroma plays a relevant role in the initiation and evolution of solid tumors. Tumor-stroma ratio (TSR) is a histological feature that expresses the proportion of the stromal component that surrounds cancer cells. In different studies, the TSR represents a potential prognostic factor: a rich stroma in tumor tissue can promote invasion and aggressiveness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility and determine the interobserver agreement in the TSR score. The stromal estimate was evaluated in patients diagnosed with colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRA), who underwent surgical resection. We also evaluated age, gender, and other anatomopathological features. Tumor-stroma ratio was calculated based on the slide used in routine diagnostic pathology to determine the T-status. Stromal percentages were separated into 2 categories: ⩽50%-low stroma and >50%-high stroma. The interobserver agreement in the TSR scoring was evaluated among 4 pathologists at different stages of professional experience, using 2 different ways to learn the scoring system. In total, 98 patients were included in this study; 54.1% were male, with a mean age of 61.9 years. Localized disease was diagnosed in 60.2% of patients. Stromal-poor CRA was predominant. The concordance between the TSR percentages of the 4 pathologists was substantial (Kappa > 0.6). There was greater agreement among pathologists for stromal-poor tumors. Substantial agreement and high reproducibility were observed in the determination of TSR score. The TSR score is feasible, suggesting that the presented methodology can be used to facilitate the determination of the stromal proportion of potential prognostic factor.

Indexed as

agreementcolorectal cancerinterobserver variabilityprognostic factorTumor-stroma ratio

Identifiers

PMID33634262
PMCPMC7887673
OpenAlexW3129344030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.