Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33634210›Full record

ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2021

Analysis of opacification patterns in intraocular lenses (IOL).

Marc Mackert, Daniel Rudolf Muth, Efstathios Vounotrypidis, Constanze Deger, David Goldblum, Mehdi Shajari, Pascal Willy Hasler, Siegfried Priglinger, Armin Wolf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A mini-invasive surgical technique for Carlevale IOL implantation: case series study and description of concomitant surgery.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marc Mackert *Department of Ophthalmology, University of Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen Medizinische Fakultat, Munchen, Bayern, Germany.
Daniel Rudolf Muth *Department of Ophthalmology, University of Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen Medizinische Fakultat, Munchen, Bayern, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3670-976X
Efstathios VounotrypidisOphthalmology, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9833-2200
Constanze DegerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen Medizinische Fakultat, Munchen, Bayern, Germany.
David GoldblumDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Basel, Universitatsspital Basel Augenklinik, Basel, Switzerland.
Mehdi ShajariDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen Medizinische Fakultat, Munchen, Bayern, Germany.
Pascal Willy HaslerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Basel, Universitatsspital Basel Augenklinik, Basel, Switzerland.
Siegfried PriglingerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen Medizinische Fakultat, Munchen, Bayern, Germany.
Armin WolfOphthalmology, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity Hospital Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIntraocular lens (IOL) opacification may cause severe visual impairment. The pathogenesis remains unclear. The aim of this study was to analyse opacification patterns in different IOLs. Therefore, this multicentre, retrospective, observational study was conducted at Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany and University-Hospital Basel, Switzerland. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this study, 75 opacified IOLs were identified and classified after extraction. Macroscopical photo documentation, light and electron microscopic analysis were done.

results68 acrylic-hydrophilic single-piece-IOLs, 1 acrylic-hydrophilic 3-piece-IOL, 6 acrylic-hydrophobic 3-piece-IOLs were extracted. The dataset comprised IOLs known for opacification and IOLs not having been reported yet. 67 IOLs showed a fine-granular and 8 IOLs a crust-like opacification pattern. According to literature, 62 of the fine-granular opacified IOLs were graded into type 1 (processing/packaging-induced primary opacification) and 13 into type 2 (secondary opacification of unknown aetiology). The anterior surface of the IOLs was affected in all 75 IOLs, the posterior surface only in 23 cases. Of all 67 fine-granular IOLs, 43 had a central defect and 21 had a zone without opacification (clear islet).

conclusionIn our series, the morphology of IOL opacification did not follow the existing pathogenetic classification that strictly discriminates between primary and secondary causes. Fine-granular IOL opacification occurs with similar patterns in both type 1 and type 2 IOL opacification, while a crust-like pattern was only detected in type 2 IOL opacifications. Consequently, susceptibility of an IOL to opacification is caused by a multifactorial combination of material and processing properties as well as individual (pathological) conditions of the patient.

Indexed as

lens and zonulesoptics and refraction

Identifiers

PMID33634210
PMCPMC7880112
OpenAlexW3128604767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.