Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33634086›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2021

Multiomics Data Collection, Visualization, and Utilization for Guiding Metabolic Engineering.

Somtirtha Roy, Tijana Radivojevic, Mark Forrer, Jose Manuel Marti, Vamshi Jonnalagadda, Tyler Backman, William Morrell, Hector Plahar, Joonhoon Kim, Nathan Hillson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Optimisation of surfactin yield inComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Somtirtha RoyLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Tijana RadivojevicLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Mark ForrerDepartment of Energy, Agile BioFoundry, Emeryville, CA, United States.
Jose Manuel MartiLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Vamshi JonnalagaddaLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Tyler BackmanLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Berkeley, CA, United States.
William MorrellDepartment of Energy, Agile BioFoundry, Emeryville, CA, United States.
Hector PlaharLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Joonhoon KimJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, CA, United States.
Nathan HillsonLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Hector Garcia MartinLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Berkeley, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biology has changed radically in the past two decades, growing from a purely descriptive science into also a design science. The availability of tools that enable the precise modification of cells, as well as the ability to collect large amounts of multimodal data, open the possibility of sophisticated bioengineering to produce fuels, specialty and commodity chemicals, materials, and other renewable bioproducts. However, despite new tools and exponentially increasing data volumes, synthetic biology cannot yet fulfill its true potential due to our inability to predict the behavior of biological systems. Here, we showcase a set of computational tools that, combined, provide the ability to store, visualize, and leverage multiomics data to predict the outcome of bioengineering efforts. We show how to upload, visualize, and output multiomics data, as well as strain information, into online repositories for several isoprenol-producing strain designs. We then use these data to train machine learning algorithms that recommend new strain designs that are correctly predicted to improve isoprenol production by 23%. This demonstration is done by using synthetic data, as provided by a novel library, that can produce credible multiomics data for testing algorithms and computational tools. In short, this paper provides a step-by-step tutorial to leverage these computational tools to improve production in bioengineered strains.

Indexed as

biofuelsflux analysismachine learningmetabolic engineeringmultiomics analysissynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID33634086
PMCPMC7902046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.