Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33634024›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020

A New Horizon of Liquid Biopsy in Thymic Epithelial Tumors: The Potential Utility of Circulating Cell-Free DNA.

Margaret Ottaviano, Mario Giuliano, Marianna Tortora, Evelina La Civita, Antonietta Liotti, Michele Longo, Dario Bruzzese, Michele Cennamo, Vittorio Riccio, Pietro De Placido and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Liquid Biopsies for Molecular Biology-Based Radiotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  9. Impact of Preanalytical and Analytical Methods on Cell-Free DNA Diagnostics.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Margaret OttavianoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Mario GiulianoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Marianna TortoraCRCTR Rare Tumors Coordinating Center of Campania Region, Naples, Italy.
Evelina La CivitaDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Antonietta LiottiDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Michele LongoDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Dario BruzzeseDepartment of Public Health, Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Michele CennamoDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Vittorio RiccioDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Pietro De PlacidoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Fernanda PicozziDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Sara ParolaDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Bruno DanieleOncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, Naples, Italy.
Gerardo BottiCRCTR Rare Tumors Coordinating Center of Campania Region, Naples, Italy.
Pietro FormisanoDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Francesco BeguinotDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Sabino De PlacidoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Daniela TerraccianoDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Giovannella PalmieriCRCTR Rare Tumors Coordinating Center of Campania Region, Naples, Italy.
University of Naples Federico II · ITRegione Campania · ITIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare thoracic malignancies, commonly divided into two different histopathological entities, thymoma (T) and thymic carcinoma (TC). To date, there are no specific biomarkers for monitoring the biological course of these rare tumors. We carried out a single center study aiming at the detection of circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) and the correlation of its levels with metastatic dissemination and histological subtype in patients with TETs.

methodsFrom July 2018 to January 2020, 5-ml blood samples from 26 patients with advanced TET (aTET) (11 patients with TC and 15 patients with T) and from six patients with completely resected TET (cr-TET), were prospectively obtained before the initiation of systemic therapy. Blood samples from 10 healthy donors were used as control. The QIAamp MinElute ccfDNA Kits was used for ccfDNA isolation from plasma; real-time PCR was used for cfDNA quantification.

resultsWe found significantly higher ccfDNA amount in patients with T and TC compared to controls, with median ccfDNA level of 3.3 ng/µl, 11.4 ng/µl and 25.6 ng/µl, for healthy donors, T and TC patients, respectively (p<0.001). No significant difference was found between cr-TET and controls (p = 0.175). ccfDNA concentrations were higher in metastatic (M1a and M1b) compared to non-metastatic (M0) TETs (25.6 ng/µl versus 7.2 ng/µl; p= 0.037). No significant correlation was found either between ccfDNA and disease stage, according to both the Masaoka-Koga (p= 0.854) and the TNM 8th edition staging systems (p = 0.66), or between ccfDNA levels and overall tumor burden, estimated according RECIST 1.1 criteria (r = 0.07, p = 0.725).

conclusionsTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that prospectively explores detection and quantification of ccfDNA in TETs. Higher baseline cfDNA levels have been observed in both advanced T and TC comparing to the control group.

Indexed as

biomarkerscirculating cell-free DNAcirculating tumor DNAstage systemthymic carcinomathymic epithelial tumorsthymoma

Identifiers

PMID33634024
PMCPMC7902074
OpenAlexW3128804144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.