Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33634022›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020

A Urine-Based Liquid Biopsy Method for Detection of Upper Tract Urinary Carcinoma.

Yansheng Xu, Xin Ma, Xing Ai, Jiangping Gao, Yiming Liang, Qin Zhang, Tonghui Ma, Kaisheng Mao, Qiaosong Zheng, Sizhen Wang and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04994197 (A Study of the Urine Non-invasive Liquid Biopsy in Diagnosis and Recurrence Diagnosis of Urothelial Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04994197 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Study of the Urine Non-invasive Liquid Biopsy in Diagnosis and Recurrence Diagnosis of Urothelial Carcinoma

TypeobservationalSponsorRuijin HospitalRan2022 to 2024Enrolled970ConditionsUrothelial CarcinomaArmsObservational study only - no intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yansheng XuDepartment of Urology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xin MaDepartment of Urology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xing AiDepartment of Urology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jiangping GaoDepartment of Urology, The Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yiming LiangGenetron Health (Beijing) Technology, Co. Ltd., Beijing, China.
Qin ZhangGenetron Health (Beijing) Technology, Co. Ltd., Beijing, China.
Tonghui MaGenetron Health (Beijing) Technology, Co. Ltd., Beijing, China.
Kaisheng MaoGenetron Health (Beijing) Technology, Co. Ltd., Beijing, China.
Qiaosong ZhengGenetron Health (Beijing) Technology, Co. Ltd., Beijing, China.
Sizhen WangGenetron Health (Beijing) Technology, Co. Ltd., Beijing, China.
Yuchen JiaoState Key Lab of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xu ZhangDepartment of Urology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hongzhao LiDepartment of Urology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConventional clinical detection methods such as CT, urine cytology, and ureteroscopy display low sensitivity and/or are invasive in the diagnosis of upper tract urinary carcinoma (UTUC), a factor precluding their use. Previous studies on urine biopsy have not shown satisfactory sensitivity and specificity in the application of both gene mutation or gene methylation panels. Therefore, these unfavorable factors call for an urgent need for a sensitive and non-invasive method for the diagnosis of UTUC.

methodsIn this study, a total of 161 hematuria patients were enrolled with (n = 69) or without (n = 92) UTUC. High-throughput sequencing of 17 genes and methylation analysis for

resultsIn total, 86 UTUC- and 64 UTUC+ case samples were enrolled for the analysis. A logistic regression analysis of significant features including age, the mutation status of

conclusionThis work utilized the epigenetic biomarker

Indexed as

hematurialiquid biopsylogistic regression modelmethylationnext-generation sequencingupper tract urinary carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID33634022
PMCPMC7901537
OpenAlexW3117516373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.