Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33633960›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2021

Prognostic analysis of pancreatic carcinoma with portal system invasion following curative resection.

Jing Wang, Shao-Cheng Lyu, Lin Zhou, Han Wang, Fei Pan, Tao Jiang, Ren Lang, Qiang He

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jing WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Splenic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shao-Cheng LyuDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Splenic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Lin ZhouDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Splenic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Han WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Splenic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Fei PanDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Splenic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Tao JiangDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Splenic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ren LangDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Splenic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Qiang HeDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Splenic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo analyze the related factors affecting the prognosis of pancreatic carcinoma with portal system invasion.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 118 patients with portal venous system invasion in Beijing Chaoyang Hospital between January 2011 and December 2018. Only patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer were included in this study. Borderline pancreatic cancer was defined according to NCCN (The National Comprehensive Cancer Network) guidelines. All patients underwent surgical treatment combined with vascular resection and reconstruction. The prognosis was evaluated according to the follow-up results, and the related risk factors for prognosis were analyzed. The survival curve was drawn by Kaplan-Meier method, and the survival rate was compared by log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression was used to analyze the prognostic factors.

resultsIn our research, all of 126 patients were successfully completed the operations. Complications occurred in 29.7% of patients and perioperative death in 4.0%. A total of 118 patients were followed up and the followed-up rate was 97.5% (118/121). The overall 1-year, 2-year and 3-year survival rates were 49.2%, 27.1% and 19.8%, And the median survival time was 20 months. Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative CA19-9 (RR 1.449, 95% CI: 1.053-1.994), N status (RR 2.533, 95% CI: 1.337-4.798), degree of tumor differentiation (RR 1.592, 95% CI: 1.064-2.381) and venous invasion depth (RR 2.03, 95% CI: 1.504-2.758) were independent risk factors for the prognosis.

conclusionsThe long-term prognosis of pancreatic carcinoma patients with portal system invasion is poor. The venous invasion depth is an independent risk factor for the prognosis of pancreatic carcinoma with portal system invasion, the deeper of venous invasion, the worse the prognosis, and poorly differentiated tumors have the worst prognosis. Other independent risk factors included N status and the preoperative CA19-9. Those may help with patients' selection for different treatment protocols.

Indexed as

Pancreatic carcinomaprognosisrisk factorssurgical proceduresvascular invasion

Identifiers

PMID33633960
PMCPMC7882355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.