Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33633797›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2021

Telemedicine in clinical gastroenterology practice: what do patients prefer?

Adi Lahat, Zina Shatz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Patient and clinician satisfaction with home parenteral nutrition intestinal failure telemedicine consultations: A survey of clinicians and patients.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Exploring the Experiences of Virtual Inflammatory Bowel Disease Care in Saskatchewan.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Telehealth for Pediatric Gastroenterology in the COVID-19 Era and Beyond.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Innovation in Gastroenterology-Can We Do Better?Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  18. The Use of Telemedicine in Older Patients with Gastrointestinal Diseases.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adi LahatDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, 52621, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1513-7280
Zina ShatzDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel, affiliated with Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Tel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic has forced major changes on healthcare systems. Maintaining regular patients' surveillance became a major challenge. Telemedicine has been promoted as an economic and effective way for long distance patient care. Our aim was to study patients' acceptance and perspectives on telemedicine.

methodsPatients scheduled for clinic appointments were offered telemedicine. Those who agreed were asked to fill in a questionnaire assessing their satisfaction with the medical consultation. Patients' demographic characteristics and answers were collected and reviewed.

resultsOut of 358 patients approached 71 agreed to use telemedicine. Of them, 59 completed the questionnaire and were included in the study. All patients' basic demographic data were collected. Patients' included in the study mean age was: 43 ± 16.3 years, 35 (59.3%) women. Patients who chose not to use telemedicine were significantly older, mean age: 61 ± 15.2 years (

conclusionsTelemedicine gained a high satisfaction rate among patients under regular medical surveillance. Most patients stated this that method is convenient, time saving and increases their compliance. Patients who agreed to telecare were younger, and tended to be of female gender and experiencing IBD. Further studies are needed to characterize specific barriers to telecare usage.

Indexed as

COVID-19 pandemicpreferencesatisfactiontelecaretelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID33633797
PMCPMC7887676
OpenAlexW3130737590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.