Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33633761›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2021

Modeling Illustrates That Genomic Selection Provides New Opportunities for Intercrop Breeding.

Jon Bančič, Christian R Werner, R Chris Gaynor, Gregor Gorjanc, Damaris A Odeny, Henry F Ojulong, Ian K Dawson, Stephen P Hoad, John M Hickey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Toward plant breeding for multicrop systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jon BančičRoyal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Research Centre, Midlothian, United Kingdom.
Christian R WernerRoyal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Research Centre, Midlothian, United Kingdom.
R Chris GaynorRoyal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Research Centre, Midlothian, United Kingdom.
Gregor GorjancRoyal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Research Centre, Midlothian, United Kingdom.
Damaris A OdenyInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, ICRAF House, Nairobi, Kenya.
Henry F OjulongInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, ICRAF House, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ian K DawsonScotland's Rural College (SRUC), Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Stephen P HoadScotland's Rural College (SRUC), Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
John M HickeyRoyal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Research Centre, Midlothian, United Kingdom.
Scotland's Rural College · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics · KERoslin Institute · GBWorld Agroforestry Centre · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intercrop breeding programs using genomic selection can produce faster genetic gain than intercrop breeding programs using phenotypic selection. Intercropping is an agricultural practice in which two or more component crops are grown together. It can lead to enhanced soil structure and fertility, improved weed suppression, and better control of pests and diseases. Especially in subsistence agriculture, intercropping has great potential to optimize farming and increase profitability. However, breeding for intercrop varieties is complex as it requires simultaneous improvement of two or more component crops that combine well in the field. We hypothesize that genomic selection can significantly simplify and accelerate the process of breeding crops for intercropping. Therefore, we used stochastic simulation to compare four different intercrop breeding programs implementing genomic selection and an intercrop breeding program entirely based on phenotypic selection. We assumed three different levels of genetic correlation between monocrop grain yield and intercrop grain yield to investigate how the different breeding strategies are impacted by this factor. We found that all four simulated breeding programs using genomic selection produced significantly more intercrop genetic gain than the phenotypic selection program regardless of the genetic correlation with monocrop yield. We suggest a genomic selection strategy which combines monocrop and intercrop trait information to predict general intercropping ability to increase selection accuracy in the early stages of a breeding program and to minimize the generation interval.

Indexed as

genomic selectionintercrop breeding program designsintercropping abilitystochastic simulationsustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID33633761
PMCPMC7902002
OpenAlexW3128615532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.