Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33633621›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020

Interaction Between Sex and Cardiac Interoceptive Accuracy in Measures of Induced Pain.

Eszter Ferentzi, Mattis Geiger, Sandra A Mai-Lippold, Ferenc Köteles, Christian Montag, Olga Pollatos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Eszter FerentziInstitute of Health Promotion and Sport Sciences, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Mattis GeigerDepartment of Individual Differences and Psychological Assessment, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Sandra A Mai-LippoldDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Ferenc KötelesInstitute of Health Promotion and Sport Sciences, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Christian MontagDepartment of Molecular Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Olga PollatosDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Universität Ulm · DEEötvös Loránd University · HUHologic (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain perception is influenced by several factors, and among them, affect, sex, and perception of bodily signals are assumed to play a prominent role. The aim of the present study is to explore how sex, cardiac interoceptive accuracy, and the interaction of the latter two influence the perception of experimentally induced pain. We investigated a large sample of young adults (

Indexed as

affectcardiac interoceptive accuracyinteroceptionpain perceptionsex differences

Identifiers

PMID33633621
PMCPMC7900538
OpenAlexW3129154474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.