Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33633444›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2021

Treatment Satisfaction, Patient Preferences, and the Impact of Suboptimal Disease Control in a Large International Rheumatoid Arthritis Cohort: SENSE Study.

Peter C Taylor, Codrina Ancuta, Orsolya Nagy, María C de la Vega, Andrey Gordeev, Radka Janková, Umut Kalyoncu, Ivan Lagunes-Galindo, Jadranka Morović-Vergles, Mariana Peixoto G U E Silva de Souza and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05790356 (Fecal Microbial Transplantation for Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05790356 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Fecal Microbial Transplantation for Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sRan2023 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsArthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Fecal Microbiota TransplantationArmsFecal Microbial transplant, Placebo capsules
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 11 countries.

Peter C TaylorBotnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7766-6167
Codrina AncutaDepartment of Rheumatology, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iași, Romania.
Orsolya NagyAbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL, USA.
María C de la VegaCEIM Investigaciones Medicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Andrey GordeevV.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Radka JankováDepartment of Pediatric and Adult Rheumatology, Faculty Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
Umut KalyoncuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Ivan Lagunes-GalindoAbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL, USA.
Jadranka Morović-VerglesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology, Allergology and Rheumatology, Dubrava University Hospital, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Mariana Peixoto G U E Silva de SouzaSanta Casa de Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Bernadette RojkovichDepartment of Rheumatology and Physiotherapy, Polyclinic of the Hospitaller Brothers of St. John of God, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Prodromos SidiropoulosFaculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
Atsushi KawakamiDepartment of Immunology and Rheumatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
AbbVie (United States) · USAssociation of Rheumatologists of Russia · RUGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROGrupo Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte · BRHacettepe University · TRNagasaki University · JPNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBSemmelweis University · HUUniversity Hospital in Motol · CZUniversity of Crete · GRUniversity of Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients' needs and perspectives are important determinants of treatment success in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Assessing patients' perspectives can help identify unmet needs and enhance the understanding of treatment benefits.

objectiveThe SENSE study assessed the impact of inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on treatment satisfaction, disease outcomes, and patient perspectives related to RA disease management.

methodsSENSE was a noninterventional, cross-sectional study conducted in 18 countries across Europe, Asia, and South America. Adult patients with poorly controlled RA of moderate/high disease activity were eligible. Patient satisfaction was assessed by the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM v1.4). Treatment adherence, healthcare resource utilization (HRU), quality of life (QoL), work ability, digital health literacy (DHL), patient preference information, and treatment strategy were also assessed.

resultsA total of 1624 patients were included in the study: most were female (84.2%) and middle-aged, and mean disease duration was 10.5 years. Mean TSQM global satisfaction subscore was 60.9, with only 13.5% of patients reporting good treatment satisfaction (TSQM global ≥80). The strongest predictor of good treatment satisfaction was treatment with advanced therapies. Most patients (87.4%) reported good treatment adherence. In general, patients had impaired QoL and work ability, high HRU, and 67.4% had poor DHL. Leading treatment expectations were "general improvement of arthritis" and "less joint pain". Most patients preferred oral RA medications (60.7%) and rapid (≤1 week) onset of action (71.1%). "Increased risk for malignancies" and "increased risk for cardiovascular disease" were the least acceptable side effects. Despite suboptimal control, advanced therapies were only used in a minority of patients, and DMARD switches were planned for only half of the patients.

conclusionSuboptimal disease control negatively impacts treatment satisfaction, work ability, QoL, and HRU. Data collected on patient perspectives may inform shared decision-making and optimize treat-to-target strategies for improving patient outcomes in RA.

Indexed as

adherencedigital health literacypatient preferencerheumatoid arthritistreatment satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID33633444
PMCPMC7900444
OpenAlexW3119666539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.