ArticleScientific reports2021
Wiskott Aldrich syndrome: healthcare utilizations and disparities in transplant care.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Splenectomy revisited in Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome in the era of HSCT and gene therapy: a bridge, a rescue, or simply obsolete?Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome: clinical, immunological, and genetic characterization of the first Moroccan cohort.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Comprehensive clinical and immunologic characterization of Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome in Iran: a 10-year cohort study.BMC immunology · 2025Article
- Síndrome de Wiskott-Aldrich en España: incidencia, mortalidad y sesgo de género durante 21 años.Revista clinica espanola · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wiskott Aldrich syndrome (WAS) is a rare disease and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) is considered the treatment modality of choice for WAS. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis on the KIDS' pediatric inpatient database and compared hospitalization rates, complications and healthcare utilizations in the transplant and non-transplant arms. Of the 383 pediatric admissions with diagnosis of WAS between 2006-2012, 114 underwent transplant and 269 did not. The non-transplant arm included older children, female patients and more African Americans. Death rates, income and payer source were similar in both arms, however the total charge for each admission was higher in the transplant arm. Emergency room visits were similar but non-elective admissions were more in the non-transplant arm. Length of stay was prolonged in the transplant arm. When comparing morbidities, lymphomas, ulcerative colitis and autoimmune complications of WAS were seen only in the non-transplant arm. Our study shows that transplant is the largest contributor to healthcare utilization in WAS patients. We identified healthcare disparities based on race and socioeconomic status and found that this rare disease is being appropriately directed to centers with HCT expertise. We noted a change in practice moving away from splenectomy in WAS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.