Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33633291›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

A comparative two-cohort study of pediatric patients with long term stay in ICUs.

Julia García Mancebo, Sara de la Mata Navazo, Estíbaliz López-Herce Arteta, Rosario Montero Mateo, Isabel María López Esteban, Adriana Mazzuchelli Domínguez, María Sánchez Doutel, Jesús López-Herce Cid, Rafael González Cortés

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Clinical features of pediatric patients with prolonged Pediatric Intensive Care Unit stay.Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Nursing-Sensitive Outcomes among Patients Cared for in Paediatric Intensive Care Units: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Julia García ManceboPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital, 2ª Planta Bloque D, Calle Doctor Castelo 47, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
Sara de la Mata NavazoPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital, 2ª Planta Bloque D, Calle Doctor Castelo 47, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
Estíbaliz López-Herce ArtetaPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital, 2ª Planta Bloque D, Calle Doctor Castelo 47, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
Rosario Montero MateoDepartment of Maternal and Child and Public Health, Complutense University of Madrid, Plaza Ramón y Cajal S/N, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Isabel María López EstebanDepartment of Maternal and Child and Public Health, Complutense University of Madrid, Plaza Ramón y Cajal S/N, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Adriana Mazzuchelli DomínguezDepartment of Maternal and Child and Public Health, Complutense University of Madrid, Plaza Ramón y Cajal S/N, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
María Sánchez DoutelDepartment of Maternal and Child and Public Health, Complutense University of Madrid, Plaza Ramón y Cajal S/N, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Jesús López-Herce CidPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital, 2ª Planta Bloque D, Calle Doctor Castelo 47, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
Rafael González CortésPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital, 2ª Planta Bloque D, Calle Doctor Castelo 47, 28007, Madrid, Spain. rafa_gonzalez_cortes@hotmail.com.
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the last decades, the number of patients with long stay admissions (LSA) in PICU has increased. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with PICU LSA, assessing healthcare resources use and changes in the profile of these patients. A retrospective, observational, single-center study was carried out. Characteristics of LSA were compared between two periods (2006-2010 and 2011-2015). During the earlier period there were 2,118 admissions (3.9% of them LSA), whereas during the second period, there were 1,763 (5.4% of them LSA) (p = 0.025). LSA accounted for 33.7% PICU stay days during the first period and 46.7% during the second (p < 0.001). Higher use of non-invasive ventilation (80.2% vs. 37.8%, p = 0.001) and high-flow oxygen therapy (68.8% vs. 37.8%, p = 0.005) was observed in the 2011-2015 cohort, whereas the use of arterial catheter (77.1% vs. 92.6%, p = 0.005), continuous infusion of adrenaline (55.2% vs. 75.9%, p = 0.004), and hemoderivative transfusion (74% vs. 89.2%, p = 0.010) was less frequent. In the 2006-2010 cohort, hospital-acquired infections were more common (95.2% vs. 68.8%, p < 0.001) and mortality was higher (26.8% vs. 13.8%, p = 0.026). The number of long-stay PICU admissions have increased entailing an intensive use of healthcare resources. These patients have a high risk for complications and mortality.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsLength of StayChildCohort StudiesHumans

Identifiers

PMID33633291
PMCPMC7907334
OpenAlexW3130643907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.